[...] opposite-sex couples desiring a traditional marriage could choose the option that generally adopts portions of the covenant marriage law enacted thus far by three states. According to Professors Jennifer Drobac and Antony Page, [b]efore the late eighteenth century, marriage typically only served one or more of three goals: (1) to consolidate wealth and resources, (2) to forge political alliances, and (3) to consummate peace treaties
In June 2015, in Obergefell v. Hodges, the Supreme Court established that same-sex couples have a fu...
This paper defends the institution of civil marriage against the objection that it is inconsistent w...
History and tradition have taken a prominent place as favored rationales for the exclusion of same-s...
[...] opposite-sex couples desiring a traditional marriage could choose the option that generally ad...
Law and attitudes around marriage have changed drastically in our own history and are widely differe...
This introduction sets the stage for discussion of two papers that make different arguments for the ...
In an effort to reconcile the inconsistency between liberal ideals and inequitable adjudication of m...
Modern American marriage law was born of both Christian and Enlightenment teachings. Christians have...
History and tradition have emerged, together, as contemporary flagship arguments for limiting marria...
This Article proposes to modernize the archaic procedures states use to authorize marriages so as to...
In the context of recent accomplishments in the quest for full marriage equality for same-sex couple...
Attention to polygamy can strengthen the case for same-sex marriage. Both the historical debate on p...
Same-sex marriage is now a reality across Western countries. While this was a positive achievement f...
Marriage: eternally changing?; And the verdict is; From \u27dynamo\u27 to \u27guardian in the Europe...
Article published in the Michigan State University School of Law Student Scholarship Collection
In June 2015, in Obergefell v. Hodges, the Supreme Court established that same-sex couples have a fu...
This paper defends the institution of civil marriage against the objection that it is inconsistent w...
History and tradition have taken a prominent place as favored rationales for the exclusion of same-s...
[...] opposite-sex couples desiring a traditional marriage could choose the option that generally ad...
Law and attitudes around marriage have changed drastically in our own history and are widely differe...
This introduction sets the stage for discussion of two papers that make different arguments for the ...
In an effort to reconcile the inconsistency between liberal ideals and inequitable adjudication of m...
Modern American marriage law was born of both Christian and Enlightenment teachings. Christians have...
History and tradition have emerged, together, as contemporary flagship arguments for limiting marria...
This Article proposes to modernize the archaic procedures states use to authorize marriages so as to...
In the context of recent accomplishments in the quest for full marriage equality for same-sex couple...
Attention to polygamy can strengthen the case for same-sex marriage. Both the historical debate on p...
Same-sex marriage is now a reality across Western countries. While this was a positive achievement f...
Marriage: eternally changing?; And the verdict is; From \u27dynamo\u27 to \u27guardian in the Europe...
Article published in the Michigan State University School of Law Student Scholarship Collection
In June 2015, in Obergefell v. Hodges, the Supreme Court established that same-sex couples have a fu...
This paper defends the institution of civil marriage against the objection that it is inconsistent w...
History and tradition have taken a prominent place as favored rationales for the exclusion of same-s...