History and tradition have emerged, together, as contemporary flagship arguments for limiting marriage to different-sex couples. According to advocates of traditional marriage, same-sex couples can be excluded from marriage today because marriage always has been reserved to male-female couples. Further, some contend, the restriction of marriage to different-sex couples has long been understood as necessary to provide channels to control naturally procreative (i.e., male-female) relationships. However popular these claims might be in op-ed pieces and on talk radio, when they are made in the litigation context, the question is not whether they have rhetorical appeal but rather whether they can explain the State\u27s different marriage rules...
"Courts and legislatures grant a heterosexual couple the legal right to marry. (Krause 37) Why has t...
Conflicts and choice of law questions arising from marriage recognition are more multidimensional to...
In his dissent in the 2003 case Goodridge v. Department of Health, Justice Robert Cordy of the Massa...
The history of marriage has been one of evolution, not of static immutability, with marriage survivi...
This article critically analyzes the evolving history of marriage, prompted by the marriage equality...
Same-sex marriage is now a reality across Western countries. While this was a positive achievement f...
The article explores the threat posed by the same-sex marriage to the traditional institution of mar...
Opponents of same-sex marriage argue that the concept is oxymoronic. Marriage, they say, must involv...
History and tradition have taken a prominent place as favored rationales for the exclusion of same-s...
[...] opposite-sex couples desiring a traditional marriage could choose the option that generally ad...
This article reviews the possible justifications for legal recognition of marriage and finds some, s...
Same-sex marriage is now a reality across Western countries. While this was a positive achievement f...
An exploration of different perspectives on homosexuality throughout history, starting from ancient ...
Laws that treat married persons in a different manner than they treat single persons permeate nearly...
Same-sex relationships have already significantly altered family law, by leading to new formal relat...
"Courts and legislatures grant a heterosexual couple the legal right to marry. (Krause 37) Why has t...
Conflicts and choice of law questions arising from marriage recognition are more multidimensional to...
In his dissent in the 2003 case Goodridge v. Department of Health, Justice Robert Cordy of the Massa...
The history of marriage has been one of evolution, not of static immutability, with marriage survivi...
This article critically analyzes the evolving history of marriage, prompted by the marriage equality...
Same-sex marriage is now a reality across Western countries. While this was a positive achievement f...
The article explores the threat posed by the same-sex marriage to the traditional institution of mar...
Opponents of same-sex marriage argue that the concept is oxymoronic. Marriage, they say, must involv...
History and tradition have taken a prominent place as favored rationales for the exclusion of same-s...
[...] opposite-sex couples desiring a traditional marriage could choose the option that generally ad...
This article reviews the possible justifications for legal recognition of marriage and finds some, s...
Same-sex marriage is now a reality across Western countries. While this was a positive achievement f...
An exploration of different perspectives on homosexuality throughout history, starting from ancient ...
Laws that treat married persons in a different manner than they treat single persons permeate nearly...
Same-sex relationships have already significantly altered family law, by leading to new formal relat...
"Courts and legislatures grant a heterosexual couple the legal right to marry. (Krause 37) Why has t...
Conflicts and choice of law questions arising from marriage recognition are more multidimensional to...
In his dissent in the 2003 case Goodridge v. Department of Health, Justice Robert Cordy of the Massa...