A reproofe of M. Doct. Abbots defence, of the Catholike deformed by M. W. Perkins Wherein his sundry abuses of Gods sacred word, and most manifold mangling, misaplying, and falsifying, the auncient Fathers sentences,be so plainely discouered, euen to the eye of euery indifferent reader, that whosoeuer hath any due care of his owne saluation, can neuer hereafter giue him more credit, in matter of faith and religion. The first part. Made by W.P.B. and Doct. in diuinty.

An ansvver to a discourse intituled, Papists protesting against Protestant-popery being a vindication of papists not misrepresented by Protestants : and containing a particular examination of Monsieur de Meaux, late Bishop of Condom, his Exposition of the doctrine of the Church of Rome, in the articles of invocation of saints, and the worship of images occasioned by that discourse.

Sherlock, William, 1641?-1707.

January 1686

[2], 131 (i.e. 117) p.Reproduction of original in Union Theological Seminary Library, New York.Attri...

The true Catholick, and Catholick church described. And the vanity of the Papists, and all other schismaticks, that confine the Catholick church to their sect, discovered and shamed. / By Richard Baxter, a member of that one Universal Church, which containeth all the true Christians in the world. With an apologetical postscript against the factious principles and writings of Mr T. Malpas, Mr T Pierce, Philo-Tilenus, and such others.

Baxter, Richard, 1615-1691.

January 1660

[12], 335 [i.e. 331], [1] p.Page 331 is misnumbered 335.A reply to: Malpas, Thomas. A box of spikenh...

A reply to the ansvver of the Catholiqve apology, or, A cleere vindication of the Catholiques of England from all matter of fact charg'd against them by their enemyes

Castlemaine, Roger Palmer, Earl of, 1634-1705.
Pugh, Robert, 1609-1679.

288 p.Attributed to Roger Palmer, Earl of Castlemaine by Wing and NUC pre-1956 imprints; also attrib...

Defence of the Reformed Catholicke of M. W. Perkins. Part 2

Abbot, Robert, 1560-1618.

January 1607

[16], 176, 187-1241, [1] p.A reply to: Bishop, William. A reformation of a Catholike deformed.Print...

A defence of M. Perkins booke, called A reformed Catholike against the cauils of a popish writer, one D.B.P. or W.B. in his deformed Reformation. By Antony Wotton.

Wotton, Anthony, 1561?-1626.
Perkins, William, 1558-1602. Reformed Catholike.
Bishop, William, 1554?-1624. Reformation of a Catholike deformed: by M. W. Perkins.

January 1606

[12], 600 p.A reprinting of and reply to "A reformation of a Catholike deformed: by M. W. Perkins" b...

Defence of the Reformed Catholicke of M. W. Perkins. Part 3

Abbot, Robert, 1560-1618.

January 1609

[8], 184, 183-385, [1], 80, 91-108 p.A reply to: Bishop, William. The second part of The reformatio...

The true ancient Roman Catholike Being an apology or counterproofe against Doctor Bishops Reproofe of the defence of the Reformed Catholike. The first part. Wherein the name of Catholikes is vindicated from popish abuse, and thence is shewed that the faith of the Church of Rome as now it is, is not the Catholike faith ... By Robert Abbot ...

Abbot, Robert, 1560-1618.

January 1611

[20], 402, [2] p.A reply to: Bishop, William. A reproofe of M. Doct. Abbots defence, of the Catholi...

A booke intituled, The English Protestants recantation, in mattersof religion wherein is demonstratiuely proued, by the writings of the principall, and best learned English Protestant bishops, and doctors, and rules of their religion, published allowed, or subscribed vnto, bythem, since the comminge of our King Iames into England, that not onely all generall grownds of diuinitie, are against the[m], but in euery particular cheife question, betweene Catholicks & them, they are in errour, by their owne iudgments : diuided accordingly, into two parts, whereof the first entreateth of those generall grounds, the other of such particular controuersies, whereby will also manifestely appeare the vanitie of D. Morton Protest. Bishop of Chester his boke called Appeale, or, Ansuueare to the Catholicke authour of thebooke entituled, The Protestants apologie.

Broughton, Richard.

January 1617

406, [1] p.Attributed to Broughton by STC (2nd ed.)."With Licence."Place of publication and publishe...

A reply against M. Gilbert Brovvne priest Wherein is handled many of the greatest and weightiest pointes of controuersie betweene vs and the papists, and the truth of our doctrine clearely proued, and the falset of their religion and doctrine laide open, and most euidentlie conuicted and confuted, by the testimonies of the Scripture and auncient fathers; and also by some of their own popes, doctors, cardinals, and of their owne writters. Whereunto is anexed a seuerall treatise, concerning the masse and Antichrist. By M. Iohn Welsche, preacher of Christs Gospell at Aire.

Welch, John, 1568?-1622.
Browne, Gilbert, d. 1612.

January 1602

[36], 363, [1] p.At foot of title: Cum priuilegio regio.Prints for the first time Welch's original l...

A defence of Catholikes persecuted in England invincibly prouing their holy religion to be that which is the only true religion of Christ; and that they in professing it, are become most faithfull, dutifull, and loyall subiects, to God, their King and country. And therefore are rather to be honoured and respected, then persecuted or molested. Composed by an ould studient in diuinitie.

Broughton, Richard.

January 1630

[8], 175, [1] p.Ould student in diuinitie = Richard Broughton.Bifolium L1.8 is a cancel, with 28 li...

A iust and temperate defence of the fiue books of ecclesiastical policie: written by M. Richard Hooker against an vncharitable letter of certain English Protestants (as they tearme themselues) crauing resolution, in some matters of doctrine, which seeme to ouerthrow the foundation of religion, and the Church amongst vs. Written by William Covel Doctor in Diuinitie, and published by authority. The contents whereof are in the page following.

Covell, William, d. 1614?

January 1603

[8], 154 [i.e. 152] p.A reply to: A Christian letter of certaine English protestants, unfained favou...

The second part of the reformation of a Catholike deformed by Master W. Perkins

Bishop, William, 1554?-1624.

January 1607

214, [2], 30 p.Attributed to William Bishop by STC (2nd ed.) and NUC pre-1956 imprints."Printed with...

A reply to the defense of the Exposition of the doctrin of the Church of England being a further vindication of the Bishop of Condom's exposition of the doctrin of the Catholic Church : with a second letter from the Bishop of Meaux.

Johnston, Joseph, d. 1723.

January 1687

[32], 190, [12] p.Attributed to Johnston by Wing.Imperfect: stained, with print show-through and los...

A defense of the sincere and true translations of the holie Scriptures into the English tong against the manifolde cauils, friuolous quarels, and impudent slaunders of Gregorie Martin, one of the readers of popish diuinitie in the trayterous Seminarie of Rhemes. By William Fvlke D. in Diuinitie, and M. of Pembroke haule in Cambridge. Wherevnto is added a briefe confutation of all such quarrels & cauils, as haue bene of late vttered by diuerse papistes in their English pamphlets, against the writings of the saide William Fvlke.

Fulke, William, 1538-1589.

[4], 95, [1]; 144, 147-514, 517-532, [4]; 71, [1] p.A reprinting of and reply to: Martin, Gregory. ...

A second defence of the exposition of the doctrine of the Church of England against the new exceptions of Monsieur de Meaux, Late Bishop of Condom, and his vindicator, the first part, in which the account that has been given of the Bishop of Meaux's Exposition, is fully vindicated ...

Wake, William, 1657-1737.

January 1687

2 pts. ([18], xxii, 100, [2]; [14], 198, [2] p.)Reproduction of original in Huntington Library.The s...

An ansvver to a discourse intituled, Papists protesting against Protestant-popery being a vindication of papists not misrepresented by Protestants : and containing a particular examination of Monsieur de Meaux, late Bishop of Condom, his Exposition of the doctrine of the Church of Rome, in the articles of invocation of saints, and the worship of images occasioned by that discourse.

Sherlock, William, 1641?-1707.

January 1686

[2], 131 (i.e. 117) p.Reproduction of original in Union Theological Seminary Library, New York.Attri...

The true Catholick, and Catholick church described. And the vanity of the Papists, and all other schismaticks, that confine the Catholick church to their sect, discovered and shamed. / By Richard Baxter, a member of that one Universal Church, which containeth all the true Christians in the world. With an apologetical postscript against the factious principles and writings of Mr T. Malpas, Mr T Pierce, Philo-Tilenus, and such others.

Baxter, Richard, 1615-1691.

January 1660

[12], 335 [i.e. 331], [1] p.Page 331 is misnumbered 335.A reply to: Malpas, Thomas. A box of spikenh...

A reply to the ansvver of the Catholiqve apology, or, A cleere vindication of the Catholiques of England from all matter of fact charg'd against them by their enemyes

Castlemaine, Roger Palmer, Earl of, 1634-1705.
Pugh, Robert, 1609-1679.

288 p.Attributed to Roger Palmer, Earl of Castlemaine by Wing and NUC pre-1956 imprints; also attrib...

Defence of the Reformed Catholicke of M. W. Perkins. Part 2

Abbot, Robert, 1560-1618.

January 1607

[16], 176, 187-1241, [1] p.A reply to: Bishop, William. A reformation of a Catholike deformed.Print...

A defence of M. Perkins booke, called A reformed Catholike against the cauils of a popish writer, one D.B.P. or W.B. in his deformed Reformation. By Antony Wotton.

Wotton, Anthony, 1561?-1626.
Perkins, William, 1558-1602. Reformed Catholike.
Bishop, William, 1554?-1624. Reformation of a Catholike deformed: by M. W. Perkins.

January 1606

[12], 600 p.A reprinting of and reply to "A reformation of a Catholike deformed: by M. W. Perkins" b...

Defence of the Reformed Catholicke of M. W. Perkins. Part 3

Abbot, Robert, 1560-1618.

January 1609

[8], 184, 183-385, [1], 80, 91-108 p.A reply to: Bishop, William. The second part of The reformatio...

The true ancient Roman Catholike Being an apology or counterproofe against Doctor Bishops Reproofe of the defence of the Reformed Catholike. The first part. Wherein the name of Catholikes is vindicated from popish abuse, and thence is shewed that the faith of the Church of Rome as now it is, is not the Catholike faith ... By Robert Abbot ...

Abbot, Robert, 1560-1618.

January 1611

[20], 402, [2] p.A reply to: Bishop, William. A reproofe of M. Doct. Abbots defence, of the Catholi...

A booke intituled, The English Protestants recantation, in mattersof religion wherein is demonstratiuely proued, by the writings of the principall, and best learned English Protestant bishops, and doctors, and rules of their religion, published allowed, or subscribed vnto, bythem, since the comminge of our King Iames into England, that not onely all generall grownds of diuinitie, are against the[m], but in euery particular cheife question, betweene Catholicks & them, they are in errour, by their owne iudgments : diuided accordingly, into two parts, whereof the first entreateth of those generall grounds, the other of such particular controuersies, whereby will also manifestely appeare the vanitie of D. Morton Protest. Bishop of Chester his boke called Appeale, or, Ansuueare to the Catholicke authour of thebooke entituled, The Protestants apologie.

Broughton, Richard.

January 1617

406, [1] p.Attributed to Broughton by STC (2nd ed.)."With Licence."Place of publication and publishe...

A reply against M. Gilbert Brovvne priest Wherein is handled many of the greatest and weightiest pointes of controuersie betweene vs and the papists, and the truth of our doctrine clearely proued, and the falset of their religion and doctrine laide open, and most euidentlie conuicted and confuted, by the testimonies of the Scripture and auncient fathers; and also by some of their own popes, doctors, cardinals, and of their owne writters. Whereunto is anexed a seuerall treatise, concerning the masse and Antichrist. By M. Iohn Welsche, preacher of Christs Gospell at Aire.

Welch, John, 1568?-1622.
Browne, Gilbert, d. 1612.

January 1602

[36], 363, [1] p.At foot of title: Cum priuilegio regio.Prints for the first time Welch's original l...

A defence of Catholikes persecuted in England invincibly prouing their holy religion to be that which is the only true religion of Christ; and that they in professing it, are become most faithfull, dutifull, and loyall subiects, to God, their King and country. And therefore are rather to be honoured and respected, then persecuted or molested. Composed by an ould studient in diuinitie.

Broughton, Richard.

January 1630

[8], 175, [1] p.Ould student in diuinitie = Richard Broughton.Bifolium L1.8 is a cancel, with 28 li...

A iust and temperate defence of the fiue books of ecclesiastical policie: written by M. Richard Hooker against an vncharitable letter of certain English Protestants (as they tearme themselues) crauing resolution, in some matters of doctrine, which seeme to ouerthrow the foundation of religion, and the Church amongst vs. Written by William Covel Doctor in Diuinitie, and published by authority. The contents whereof are in the page following.

Covell, William, d. 1614?

January 1603

[8], 154 [i.e. 152] p.A reply to: A Christian letter of certaine English protestants, unfained favou...

The second part of the reformation of a Catholike deformed by Master W. Perkins

Bishop, William, 1554?-1624.

January 1607

214, [2], 30 p.Attributed to William Bishop by STC (2nd ed.) and NUC pre-1956 imprints."Printed with...

A reply to the defense of the Exposition of the doctrin of the Church of England being a further vindication of the Bishop of Condom's exposition of the doctrin of the Catholic Church : with a second letter from the Bishop of Meaux.

Johnston, Joseph, d. 1723.

January 1687

[32], 190, [12] p.Attributed to Johnston by Wing.Imperfect: stained, with print show-through and los...

A defense of the sincere and true translations of the holie Scriptures into the English tong against the manifolde cauils, friuolous quarels, and impudent slaunders of Gregorie Martin, one of the readers of popish diuinitie in the trayterous Seminarie of Rhemes. By William Fvlke D. in Diuinitie, and M. of Pembroke haule in Cambridge. Wherevnto is added a briefe confutation of all such quarrels & cauils, as haue bene of late vttered by diuerse papistes in their English pamphlets, against the writings of the saide William Fvlke.

Fulke, William, 1538-1589.

[4], 95, [1]; 144, 147-514, 517-532, [4]; 71, [1] p.A reprinting of and reply to: Martin, Gregory. ...

A second defence of the exposition of the doctrine of the Church of England against the new exceptions of Monsieur de Meaux, Late Bishop of Condom, and his vindicator, the first part, in which the account that has been given of the Bishop of Meaux's Exposition, is fully vindicated ...

Wake, William, 1657-1737.

January 1687

2 pts. ([18], xxii, 100, [2]; [14], 198, [2] p.)Reproduction of original in Huntington Library.The s...

An ansvver to a discourse intituled, Papists protesting against Protestant-popery being a vindication of papists not misrepresented by Protestants : and containing a particular examination of Monsieur de Meaux, late Bishop of Condom, his Exposition of the doctrine of the Church of Rome, in the articles of invocation of saints, and the worship of images occasioned by that discourse.

Sherlock, William, 1641?-1707.

January 1686

[2], 131 (i.e. 117) p.Reproduction of original in Union Theological Seminary Library, New York.Attri...

The true Catholick, and Catholick church described. And the vanity of the Papists, and all other schismaticks, that confine the Catholick church to their sect, discovered and shamed. / By Richard Baxter, a member of that one Universal Church, which containeth all the true Christians in the world. With an apologetical postscript against the factious principles and writings of Mr T. Malpas, Mr T Pierce, Philo-Tilenus, and such others.

Baxter, Richard, 1615-1691.

January 1660

[12], 335 [i.e. 331], [1] p.Page 331 is misnumbered 335.A reply to: Malpas, Thomas. A box of spikenh...

A reply to the ansvver of the Catholiqve apology, or, A cleere vindication of the Catholiques of England from all matter of fact charg'd against them by their enemyes

Castlemaine, Roger Palmer, Earl of, 1634-1705.
Pugh, Robert, 1609-1679.

288 p.Attributed to Roger Palmer, Earl of Castlemaine by Wing and NUC pre-1956 imprints; also attrib...

Abstract

Extracted data

Abstract

Extracted data

Related items

Related items