An ansvver to a discourse intituled, Papists protesting against Protestant-popery being a vindication of papists not misrepresented by Protestants : and containing a particular examination of Monsieur de Meaux, late Bishop of Condom, his Exposition of the doctrine of the Church of Rome, in the articles of invocation of saints, and the worship of images occasioned by that discourse.

An answer to the Bishop of Condom (now of Meaux) his Exposition of the Catholick faith, &c. wherein the doctrine of the Church of Rome is detected, and that of the Church of England expressed from the publick acts of both churches : to which are added reflections on his pastoral letter.

Gilbert, John, b. 1658 or 9.

January 1686

[8], 128, [4] p.Written by John Gilbert, vicar of St. John the Baptist's Church in Peterborough. He...

A seasonable vindication of the truly catholick doctrine of the Church of England in reply to Dr. Sherlock's answer to Anonymus his three letters concerning church-communion.

Atwood, William, d. 1705?

January 1683

[2], 89 p.Errata: p. 89.Reproduction of original in Huntington Library.Marginal notes

The apologie of the Romane Church deuided into three seuerall tractes whereof 1. The first, concerneth the antiquitie and continuance of the Catholike Romane religion ever since the Apostles time. 2. The second that the Protestantes religion was not so much as in being, at or before Luthers first appearing. 3. The thirde that Catholickes are no lesse loyall and dutifull to their soveraigne, then Protestantes. All which are vndertaken and proued by testimonies of the learned Protestantes themselues.

Anderton, Lawrence.
Anderton, James, fl. 1624, attributed name.

January 1604

[18], 58, 58-72, [1], 73-191, [1] p."An advertisement to the reader" signed: I. Br., i.e. John Brere...

An answer to a discourse intituled, Papists protesting against Protestant-popery; being a vindication of Papists not misrepresented by Protestants: and containing a particular examination of Monsieur de Meaux, late bishop of Condom, his Exposition of the doctrine of the church of Rome, in the articles of invocation of saints, and the worship of images, occasioned by that discourse.

Sherlock, William, 1641?-1707.

January 1686

By William Sherlock. cf.Halkett & Laing.Numbers 59-72 omitted in paging.Mode of access: Internet

Papists protesting against Protestant-popery in answer to a discourse entituled, A papist not mis-represented by Protestants : being a vindication of The papist mis-represented and represented, and the reflections upon the answer.

Gother, John, d. 1704.

January 1686

[2], 38 p.Reproduction of original in Union Theological Seminary Library, New York

A short summary of the principal controversies between the Church of England, and the church of Rome being a vindication of several Protestant doctrines, in answer to a late pamphlet intituled, Protestancy destitute of Scripture-proofs.

Sherlock, William, 1641?-1707.

January 1687

[10], 150, [4] p.Reproduction of original in Huntington Library.Attributed to William Sherlock. cf. ...

A discourse concerning the laws ecclesiastical and civil made against hereticks by popes, emperors and kings, provincial and general councils, approved by the church of Rome with a preface against persecuting and destroying hereticks / by a cordial friend to the Protestant religion now by law established in these realms.

Barlow, Thomas, 1607-1691.
Whitby, Daniel, 1638-1726.

January 1682

[4], 48, [8], 75 p.Errata: p. [8] (2d count).Widely attributed to Bishop Barlow and to Daniel Whitby...

A vindication of the Bishop of Condom's Exposition of the doctrine of the Catholic Church in answer to a book entituled, An exposition of the doctrine of the Church of England, &c. : with a letter from the said Bishop.

Johnston, Joseph, d. 1723.

January 1686

[2], 222 [i.e. 122], [4] p.Includes bibliographical references.Errata: p. [4] at end.Advertisement: ...

Papists protesting against protestant popery. In answer to a discourse entituled, A papist not misrepresented by protestants. Being a vindication of the Papist misrepresented and represented, and the Reflections upon the answer.

Gother, John, d. 1704.

January 1686

Mode of access: Internet.With this is bound his Reflections upon the answer to the Papist mis-repres...

A vindication of some Protestant principles of Church-unity and Catholick-communion, from the charge of agreement with the Church of Rome in answer to a late pamphlet, intituled, an agreement between the Church of England and the Church of Rome, evinced from the concertation of some of her sons with their brethren the dissenters / by William Sherlock ...

Sherlock, William, 1641?-1707.

January 1688

[7], 128 [i.e. 122] p.Pages 121, 122 misnumbered 127 and 128 respectively.Reproduction of original i...

A view of the whole controversy between the representer and the answerer, with an answer to the representer's last reply in which are laid open some of the methods by which Protestants are misrepresented by papists.

Clagett, William, 1646-1688.

January 1687

[3], 123, [1] p.Errata: prelim. p. [1].Includes bibliographical references.Advertisement: p. [1] at ...

A papist not misrepresented by Protestants being a reply to the Reflections upon the Answer to (A papist misrepresented and represented.)

Sherlock, William, 1641?-1707.

January 1686

[3], 71 p.Attributed to William Sherlock. Cf. Halkett & Laing (2nd ed.).The Reflections upon the Ans...

A discourse concerning the nature, unity, and communion of the Catholick Church wherein most of the controversies relating to the church are briefly and plainly stated / by William Sherlock.

Sherlock, William, 1641?-1707.

January 1688

60 p.Reproduction of original in the Union Theological Seminary Library, New York

No popery, or, A catechism against popery wherein the heretical doctrins, idolatrous worship, and superstitious practices of the Roman Church are briefly yet plainly refuted, and the Protestant principles proved by testimonies of Holy Scripture, and evidence of reason / by a minister of the Gospell.

Minister of the Gospell.

January 1682

[2], vii, [5], 136 p.Errata: prelim. p. [5].Reproduction of original in Union Theological Seminary L...

A second defence of the exposition of the doctrine of the Church of England against the new exceptions of Monsieur de Meaux, Late Bishop of Condom, and his vindicator, the first part, in which the account that has been given of the Bishop of Meaux's Exposition, is fully vindicated ...

Wake, William, 1657-1737.

January 1687

2 pts. ([18], xxii, 100, [2]; [14], 198, [2] p.)Reproduction of original in Huntington Library.The s...

An answer to the Bishop of Condom (now of Meaux) his Exposition of the Catholick faith, &c. wherein the doctrine of the Church of Rome is detected, and that of the Church of England expressed from the publick acts of both churches : to which are added reflections on his pastoral letter.

Gilbert, John, b. 1658 or 9.

January 1686

[8], 128, [4] p.Written by John Gilbert, vicar of St. John the Baptist's Church in Peterborough. He...

A seasonable vindication of the truly catholick doctrine of the Church of England in reply to Dr. Sherlock's answer to Anonymus his three letters concerning church-communion.

Atwood, William, d. 1705?

January 1683

[2], 89 p.Errata: p. 89.Reproduction of original in Huntington Library.Marginal notes

The apologie of the Romane Church deuided into three seuerall tractes whereof 1. The first, concerneth the antiquitie and continuance of the Catholike Romane religion ever since the Apostles time. 2. The second that the Protestantes religion was not so much as in being, at or before Luthers first appearing. 3. The thirde that Catholickes are no lesse loyall and dutifull to their soveraigne, then Protestantes. All which are vndertaken and proued by testimonies of the learned Protestantes themselues.

Anderton, Lawrence.
Anderton, James, fl. 1624, attributed name.

January 1604

[18], 58, 58-72, [1], 73-191, [1] p."An advertisement to the reader" signed: I. Br., i.e. John Brere...

An answer to a discourse intituled, Papists protesting against Protestant-popery; being a vindication of Papists not misrepresented by Protestants: and containing a particular examination of Monsieur de Meaux, late bishop of Condom, his Exposition of the doctrine of the church of Rome, in the articles of invocation of saints, and the worship of images, occasioned by that discourse.

Sherlock, William, 1641?-1707.

January 1686

By William Sherlock. cf.Halkett & Laing.Numbers 59-72 omitted in paging.Mode of access: Internet

Papists protesting against Protestant-popery in answer to a discourse entituled, A papist not mis-represented by Protestants : being a vindication of The papist mis-represented and represented, and the reflections upon the answer.

Gother, John, d. 1704.

January 1686

[2], 38 p.Reproduction of original in Union Theological Seminary Library, New York

A short summary of the principal controversies between the Church of England, and the church of Rome being a vindication of several Protestant doctrines, in answer to a late pamphlet intituled, Protestancy destitute of Scripture-proofs.

Sherlock, William, 1641?-1707.

January 1687

[10], 150, [4] p.Reproduction of original in Huntington Library.Attributed to William Sherlock. cf. ...

A discourse concerning the laws ecclesiastical and civil made against hereticks by popes, emperors and kings, provincial and general councils, approved by the church of Rome with a preface against persecuting and destroying hereticks / by a cordial friend to the Protestant religion now by law established in these realms.

Barlow, Thomas, 1607-1691.
Whitby, Daniel, 1638-1726.

January 1682

[4], 48, [8], 75 p.Errata: p. [8] (2d count).Widely attributed to Bishop Barlow and to Daniel Whitby...

A vindication of the Bishop of Condom's Exposition of the doctrine of the Catholic Church in answer to a book entituled, An exposition of the doctrine of the Church of England, &c. : with a letter from the said Bishop.

Johnston, Joseph, d. 1723.

January 1686

[2], 222 [i.e. 122], [4] p.Includes bibliographical references.Errata: p. [4] at end.Advertisement: ...

Papists protesting against protestant popery. In answer to a discourse entituled, A papist not misrepresented by protestants. Being a vindication of the Papist misrepresented and represented, and the Reflections upon the answer.

Gother, John, d. 1704.

January 1686

Mode of access: Internet.With this is bound his Reflections upon the answer to the Papist mis-repres...

A vindication of some Protestant principles of Church-unity and Catholick-communion, from the charge of agreement with the Church of Rome in answer to a late pamphlet, intituled, an agreement between the Church of England and the Church of Rome, evinced from the concertation of some of her sons with their brethren the dissenters / by William Sherlock ...

Sherlock, William, 1641?-1707.

January 1688

[7], 128 [i.e. 122] p.Pages 121, 122 misnumbered 127 and 128 respectively.Reproduction of original i...

A view of the whole controversy between the representer and the answerer, with an answer to the representer's last reply in which are laid open some of the methods by which Protestants are misrepresented by papists.

Clagett, William, 1646-1688.

January 1687

[3], 123, [1] p.Errata: prelim. p. [1].Includes bibliographical references.Advertisement: p. [1] at ...

A papist not misrepresented by Protestants being a reply to the Reflections upon the Answer to (A papist misrepresented and represented.)

Sherlock, William, 1641?-1707.

January 1686

[3], 71 p.Attributed to William Sherlock. Cf. Halkett & Laing (2nd ed.).The Reflections upon the Ans...

A discourse concerning the nature, unity, and communion of the Catholick Church wherein most of the controversies relating to the church are briefly and plainly stated / by William Sherlock.

Sherlock, William, 1641?-1707.

January 1688

60 p.Reproduction of original in the Union Theological Seminary Library, New York

No popery, or, A catechism against popery wherein the heretical doctrins, idolatrous worship, and superstitious practices of the Roman Church are briefly yet plainly refuted, and the Protestant principles proved by testimonies of Holy Scripture, and evidence of reason / by a minister of the Gospell.

Minister of the Gospell.

January 1682

[2], vii, [5], 136 p.Errata: prelim. p. [5].Reproduction of original in Union Theological Seminary L...

A second defence of the exposition of the doctrine of the Church of England against the new exceptions of Monsieur de Meaux, Late Bishop of Condom, and his vindicator, the first part, in which the account that has been given of the Bishop of Meaux's Exposition, is fully vindicated ...

Wake, William, 1657-1737.

January 1687

2 pts. ([18], xxii, 100, [2]; [14], 198, [2] p.)Reproduction of original in Huntington Library.The s...

An answer to the Bishop of Condom (now of Meaux) his Exposition of the Catholick faith, &c. wherein the doctrine of the Church of Rome is detected, and that of the Church of England expressed from the publick acts of both churches : to which are added reflections on his pastoral letter.

Gilbert, John, b. 1658 or 9.

January 1686

[8], 128, [4] p.Written by John Gilbert, vicar of St. John the Baptist's Church in Peterborough. He...

A seasonable vindication of the truly catholick doctrine of the Church of England in reply to Dr. Sherlock's answer to Anonymus his three letters concerning church-communion.

Atwood, William, d. 1705?

January 1683

[2], 89 p.Errata: p. 89.Reproduction of original in Huntington Library.Marginal notes

The apologie of the Romane Church deuided into three seuerall tractes whereof 1. The first, concerneth the antiquitie and continuance of the Catholike Romane religion ever since the Apostles time. 2. The second that the Protestantes religion was not so much as in being, at or before Luthers first appearing. 3. The thirde that Catholickes are no lesse loyall and dutifull to their soveraigne, then Protestantes. All which are vndertaken and proued by testimonies of the learned Protestantes themselues.

Anderton, Lawrence.
Anderton, James, fl. 1624, attributed name.

January 1604

[18], 58, 58-72, [1], 73-191, [1] p."An advertisement to the reader" signed: I. Br., i.e. John Brere...

Abstract

Extracted data

Abstract

Extracted data

Related items

Related items