The practice of strategy is different from strategic theory. The latter was largely developed by professional soldiers from the experiences of the Napoleonic Wars, and compared the present with the past to establish general truths about war. It used history as its dominant discipline until 1945. The advent of nuclear weapons made history seem less relevant, and prompted the inclusion of other disciplines; deterrence theory also made strategic theory more abstract and distant from the practice of war. Since 9/11, the experience of war has forced strategy to become less theoretical and to do better in reconciling theory with practice
Historically, the origin of Strategic Studies begins very early days and its definitions and scopes ...
Latin had no word for "strategy", but the East Romans, whom we call the Byzantines, did. This book...
In the 1990s a debate has evolved as to whether strategy should be practiced as art, science or a co...
The practice of strategy is different from strategic theory. The latter was largely developed by pro...
In the last fifty years, various attempts have been made to define the military science. The most co...
The history of military strategic thought is an ongoing struggle to develop relevant theory and doct...
At the heart of the historical study of strategy is a tension between the consideration of strategy ...
This article maps the development of strategic thinking since the 1960s and identifies an emerging p...
This new series focuses on the theory and practice of strategy. Following Clausewitz, strategy has b...
This essay surveys the development of strategic theory from its emergence in the seventeenth century...
Strategy process and practice research has illuminated the internal dynamics of strategy work – at t...
An increasingly large group of scholars in Europe have begun to take a practice lens to understandin...
In this article, I show how little the general meaning of the term changed during the 19th century. ...
This chapter outlines the history of the practice of strategy, predating the introduction of the ter...
Latin had no word for "strategy", but the East Romans, whom we call the Byzantines, did. This book t...
Historically, the origin of Strategic Studies begins very early days and its definitions and scopes ...
Latin had no word for "strategy", but the East Romans, whom we call the Byzantines, did. This book...
In the 1990s a debate has evolved as to whether strategy should be practiced as art, science or a co...
The practice of strategy is different from strategic theory. The latter was largely developed by pro...
In the last fifty years, various attempts have been made to define the military science. The most co...
The history of military strategic thought is an ongoing struggle to develop relevant theory and doct...
At the heart of the historical study of strategy is a tension between the consideration of strategy ...
This article maps the development of strategic thinking since the 1960s and identifies an emerging p...
This new series focuses on the theory and practice of strategy. Following Clausewitz, strategy has b...
This essay surveys the development of strategic theory from its emergence in the seventeenth century...
Strategy process and practice research has illuminated the internal dynamics of strategy work – at t...
An increasingly large group of scholars in Europe have begun to take a practice lens to understandin...
In this article, I show how little the general meaning of the term changed during the 19th century. ...
This chapter outlines the history of the practice of strategy, predating the introduction of the ter...
Latin had no word for "strategy", but the East Romans, whom we call the Byzantines, did. This book t...
Historically, the origin of Strategic Studies begins very early days and its definitions and scopes ...
Latin had no word for "strategy", but the East Romans, whom we call the Byzantines, did. This book...
In the 1990s a debate has evolved as to whether strategy should be practiced as art, science or a co...