Add to ORKGThis new series focuses on the theory and practice of strategy. Following Clausewitz, strategy has been understood to mean the use made of force, and the threat of the use of force, for the ends of policy. This series is as interested in ideas as in historical cases of grand strategy and military strategy in action. All historical periods, near and past, and even future, are of interest. In addition to original monographs, the series will from time to time publish edited reprints of neglected classics as well as collections of essays
Military strategy was long described as atheoretical—an art that could only be fully comprehended by...
The principles of war have been around for a long time. The principles have been discussed among mil...
Examining events after World War II shows that the emerging technological environment is shaping the...
Relationships between the United States and the Soviet Union not only wielded enormous influence on ...
The practice of strategy is different from strategic theory. The latter was largely developed by pro...
In the last fifty years, various attempts have been made to define the military science. The most co...
The great Prussian military theorist Carl von Clausewitz defines war as "An act of force to compel o...
The theorising and practice of Strategy in a modern sense did not begin only with Napoleon and Claus...
Latin had no word for "strategy", but the East Romans, whom we call the Byzantines, did. This book t...
Latin had no word for "strategy", but the East Romans, whom we call the Byzantines, did. This book...
Military strategy was long described as atheoretical—an art that could only be fully comprehended by...
The history of military strategic thought is an ongoing struggle to develop relevant theory and doct...
Clausewitz's definition of "strategy" does not greatly differ from the original definition of the te...
Clausewitz’ writings stand in two traditions. With his own very narrow definition of strategy, “Str...
Ever since the quickening of social and technological change that began during the Napoleonic era, t...
Military strategy was long described as atheoretical—an art that could only be fully comprehended by...
The principles of war have been around for a long time. The principles have been discussed among mil...
Examining events after World War II shows that the emerging technological environment is shaping the...
Relationships between the United States and the Soviet Union not only wielded enormous influence on ...
The practice of strategy is different from strategic theory. The latter was largely developed by pro...
In the last fifty years, various attempts have been made to define the military science. The most co...
The great Prussian military theorist Carl von Clausewitz defines war as "An act of force to compel o...
The theorising and practice of Strategy in a modern sense did not begin only with Napoleon and Claus...
Latin had no word for "strategy", but the East Romans, whom we call the Byzantines, did. This book t...
Latin had no word for "strategy", but the East Romans, whom we call the Byzantines, did. This book...
Military strategy was long described as atheoretical—an art that could only be fully comprehended by...
The history of military strategic thought is an ongoing struggle to develop relevant theory and doct...
Clausewitz's definition of "strategy" does not greatly differ from the original definition of the te...
Clausewitz’ writings stand in two traditions. With his own very narrow definition of strategy, “Str...
Ever since the quickening of social and technological change that began during the Napoleonic era, t...
Military strategy was long described as atheoretical—an art that could only be fully comprehended by...
The principles of war have been around for a long time. The principles have been discussed among mil...
Examining events after World War II shows that the emerging technological environment is shaping the...