Add to ORKGDefendant appealed from conviction of murder because of the incompetence and negligence of his attorney in the conduct of the trial. Held, the fact that the defendant was not properly represented by the counsel of his own choice was no ground for the court to go beyond the record and grant a new trial. People v. Hartwell (Ill. 1930) 173 N.E. 112
Criminal Law - Directed Verdict of Acquittal - The accused was convicted of crime. Error was assigne...
When a trial court sets aside a verdict and grants a new trial, the order may or may not be reviewab...
The defendant was convicted of negligent homicide as the result of a collision between his car and a...
The defendant was convicted of murder in the first degree. At the trial, certain incompetent testimo...
To represent the defendant, accused of robbery, the court at public expense, appointed an attorney, ...
In the trial of defendant for embezzlement, the prosecutor\u27s opening address to the jury included...
Defendant, represented by an attorney, was ordered, under an appearance bond, to appear at the Novem...
In a prosecution for murder the prosecuting attorney, in his opening address, improperly stated that...
In an action on an express contrast, plaintiff sued for $1750, representing the agreed 5 per cent co...
To represent the defendant, accused of robbery, the court at public expense, appointed an attorney, ...
It is generally agreed that the jury in a personal injury action should not be informed that the def...
The testimony given on a trial for murder indicated that the defendant had shot and killed one of hi...
In the trial of defendant for embezzlement, the prosecutor\u27s opening address to the jury included...
It is generally agreed that the jury in a personal injury action should not be informed that the def...
By an Ohio statute a final order might be reversed, vacated, or modified on appeal. After verdict wa...
Criminal Law - Directed Verdict of Acquittal - The accused was convicted of crime. Error was assigne...
When a trial court sets aside a verdict and grants a new trial, the order may or may not be reviewab...
The defendant was convicted of negligent homicide as the result of a collision between his car and a...
The defendant was convicted of murder in the first degree. At the trial, certain incompetent testimo...
To represent the defendant, accused of robbery, the court at public expense, appointed an attorney, ...
In the trial of defendant for embezzlement, the prosecutor\u27s opening address to the jury included...
Defendant, represented by an attorney, was ordered, under an appearance bond, to appear at the Novem...
In a prosecution for murder the prosecuting attorney, in his opening address, improperly stated that...
In an action on an express contrast, plaintiff sued for $1750, representing the agreed 5 per cent co...
To represent the defendant, accused of robbery, the court at public expense, appointed an attorney, ...
It is generally agreed that the jury in a personal injury action should not be informed that the def...
The testimony given on a trial for murder indicated that the defendant had shot and killed one of hi...
In the trial of defendant for embezzlement, the prosecutor\u27s opening address to the jury included...
It is generally agreed that the jury in a personal injury action should not be informed that the def...
By an Ohio statute a final order might be reversed, vacated, or modified on appeal. After verdict wa...
Criminal Law - Directed Verdict of Acquittal - The accused was convicted of crime. Error was assigne...
When a trial court sets aside a verdict and grants a new trial, the order may or may not be reviewab...
The defendant was convicted of negligent homicide as the result of a collision between his car and a...