Add to ORKGThe plaintiff bought a bottle of Coca-Cola from a retailer; it was opened in his presence and he drank it at once. The bottle contained decomposed parts of a mouse or rat, and the plaintiff became violently ill after drinking the Coca-Cola. In an action against the manufacturer, held, that there was an absolute warranty of fitness for human consumption, and that the manufacturer was liable for the results of any impurities, regardless of whether or not he was negligent. Coca-Cola Bottling Works v. Simpson (Miss. 1930) 130 So. 479
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has adopted the Restatement 2d, Torts, Section 400, which provides th...
This paper was presented before the Division of Food Drug Cosmetic Law, Section of Corporation, Bank...
Many have been bewitched, bedazzled, and bewildered in attempting to figure just how the principles ...
Plaintiff purchased a meal at defendant\u27s restaurant, in connection with which he was served cont...
Plaintiff\u27s husband purchased canned sauerkraut juice from a retail grocer, who, in turn, had pur...
Sales: Retail Dealer\u27s Liability for Injury Arising from Consumption of Adulterated Canned Foo
One Ocon, a retail dealer, sold a can of spinach to plaintiff\u27s wife, who, because of something d...
Plaintiff was injured by biting into a fishhook imbedded in a plug of chewing tobacco bought from an...
Since the citadel of privity first crumbled for manufacturers of defective products decades ago, sta...
Plaintiff purchased cigars from a retail merchant. The cigars were sold under a trade name and when ...
In Brown v. Superior Court the California Supreme Court held that a drug manufacturer cannot be held...
In a products liability case, evidence of defendant\u27s due care in the manufacturing or processing...
Defendant manufacturer sold poisonous hair dye to a beautician, instructing her to warn patrons to k...
The evidence supported the finding that a manufacturer was liable in negligence to party who was inj...
Judicial decisions, as well as statutory enactments, have removed many of the traditional stumbling ...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has adopted the Restatement 2d, Torts, Section 400, which provides th...
This paper was presented before the Division of Food Drug Cosmetic Law, Section of Corporation, Bank...
Many have been bewitched, bedazzled, and bewildered in attempting to figure just how the principles ...
Plaintiff purchased a meal at defendant\u27s restaurant, in connection with which he was served cont...
Plaintiff\u27s husband purchased canned sauerkraut juice from a retail grocer, who, in turn, had pur...
Sales: Retail Dealer\u27s Liability for Injury Arising from Consumption of Adulterated Canned Foo
One Ocon, a retail dealer, sold a can of spinach to plaintiff\u27s wife, who, because of something d...
Plaintiff was injured by biting into a fishhook imbedded in a plug of chewing tobacco bought from an...
Since the citadel of privity first crumbled for manufacturers of defective products decades ago, sta...
Plaintiff purchased cigars from a retail merchant. The cigars were sold under a trade name and when ...
In Brown v. Superior Court the California Supreme Court held that a drug manufacturer cannot be held...
In a products liability case, evidence of defendant\u27s due care in the manufacturing or processing...
Defendant manufacturer sold poisonous hair dye to a beautician, instructing her to warn patrons to k...
The evidence supported the finding that a manufacturer was liable in negligence to party who was inj...
Judicial decisions, as well as statutory enactments, have removed many of the traditional stumbling ...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has adopted the Restatement 2d, Torts, Section 400, which provides th...
This paper was presented before the Division of Food Drug Cosmetic Law, Section of Corporation, Bank...
Many have been bewitched, bedazzled, and bewildered in attempting to figure just how the principles ...