Add to ORKGPlaintiff was injured by biting into a fishhook imbedded in a plug of chewing tobacco bought from an independent dealer and manufactured by defendant. There was evidence that another person had discovered a foreign particle in another plug made by defendant, but he did not know the exact identity of the substance. Held, that while the plaintiff\u27s injury alone cannot raise an inference of negligence, the additional evidence of the second incident was sufficient to present the question to the jury, which found for the plaintiff. Caudle v. F. M. Bohannon Tobacco Co., 220 N. C. 105, 16 S. E. (2d) 680 (1941)
This Article examines the question of whether an unsuspecting consumer who dies from an allergic or ...
Frishman v. Metropolitan Tobacco Co., Inc., __ Misc. __, 104 N. Y. S. 2nd 446 (Sup. Ct. 1951)
Defendant manufacturer sold poisonous hair dye to a beautician, instructing her to warn patrons to k...
Plaintiff was injured by biting into a fishhook imbedded in a plug of chewing tobacco bought from an...
Plaintiff purchased at a retail shop some perfume manufactured by defendant. Plaintiff suffered a se...
Decedent\u27s widow and the administrator of his estate brought a consolidated suit against the Amer...
The defendant manufacturer sold a storekeeper, as a protective weapon, a tear gas gun made to resemb...
Sales: Retail Dealer\u27s Liability for Injury Arising from Consumption of Adulterated Canned Foo
Plaintiff purchased a meal at defendant\u27s restaurant, in connection with which he was served cont...
Before 1963, lawsuits in California by victims of product injuries were either handled under princip...
Plaintiff\u27s husband purchased canned sauerkraut juice from a retail grocer, who, in turn, had pur...
Liability in deaths resulting from accidental ingestion of harmful material, toxic food, or drug pro...
One Ocon, a retail dealer, sold a can of spinach to plaintiff\u27s wife, who, because of something d...
The plaintiff bought a bottle of Coca-Cola from a retailer; it was opened in his presence and he dra...
A group of recent decisions presents a somewhat farcical conformity with Montesquieu\u27s thesis tha...
This Article examines the question of whether an unsuspecting consumer who dies from an allergic or ...
Frishman v. Metropolitan Tobacco Co., Inc., __ Misc. __, 104 N. Y. S. 2nd 446 (Sup. Ct. 1951)
Defendant manufacturer sold poisonous hair dye to a beautician, instructing her to warn patrons to k...
Plaintiff was injured by biting into a fishhook imbedded in a plug of chewing tobacco bought from an...
Plaintiff purchased at a retail shop some perfume manufactured by defendant. Plaintiff suffered a se...
Decedent\u27s widow and the administrator of his estate brought a consolidated suit against the Amer...
The defendant manufacturer sold a storekeeper, as a protective weapon, a tear gas gun made to resemb...
Sales: Retail Dealer\u27s Liability for Injury Arising from Consumption of Adulterated Canned Foo
Plaintiff purchased a meal at defendant\u27s restaurant, in connection with which he was served cont...
Before 1963, lawsuits in California by victims of product injuries were either handled under princip...
Plaintiff\u27s husband purchased canned sauerkraut juice from a retail grocer, who, in turn, had pur...
Liability in deaths resulting from accidental ingestion of harmful material, toxic food, or drug pro...
One Ocon, a retail dealer, sold a can of spinach to plaintiff\u27s wife, who, because of something d...
The plaintiff bought a bottle of Coca-Cola from a retailer; it was opened in his presence and he dra...
A group of recent decisions presents a somewhat farcical conformity with Montesquieu\u27s thesis tha...
This Article examines the question of whether an unsuspecting consumer who dies from an allergic or ...
Frishman v. Metropolitan Tobacco Co., Inc., __ Misc. __, 104 N. Y. S. 2nd 446 (Sup. Ct. 1951)
Defendant manufacturer sold poisonous hair dye to a beautician, instructing her to warn patrons to k...