Add to ORKGOctober 7 is being called Israel’s 9/11. The comparison is apt for the lessons that can be learned as to the legality of launching a ground offensive to respond to terrorism
This article contrasts and compares the war on terror and the war of terror in the wake of, and befo...
Solarz argued that Israel\u27s air strike must be considered an understandable and legitimate act o...
The aim of this thesis is to contribute to the understanding of the nature, status and determinants ...
The U.S. and U.K. attacks on the territory of Afghanistan on 7 October 2001 were not justified as a ...
Do the laws of war govern the September 11 attacks? Did the attacks constitute war crimes ? These q...
The Obama administration has continued to apply the wartime paradigm first developed by the Bush adm...
The 2006 Israel’s military attack on Lebanon raises numerous issues concerning ‘jus ad bellum’ and ‘...
The extensive air strikes launched by Israel on Iranian forces and assets across Syria in the early ...
Transnational terrorism, politically motivated violence that crosses national boundaries, is a tangi...
In the early morning of June 30, 2006, Israeli warplanes struck a civilian apartment complex in Qana...
The United States military strikes against Afghanistan cannot be justified as self-defense under the...
Events that took place on 9/11, when symbols of American nation were destroyed by hijacked civilian ...
The 2006 Israel's military attack on Lebanon raises numerous issues concerning 'jus ad bellum' and '...
The phrase War on Terror has no discrete legal content. It was politically inspired and used by th...
A review of Israel’s sometimes controversial positions on targeting law within the law of armed conf...
This article contrasts and compares the war on terror and the war of terror in the wake of, and befo...
Solarz argued that Israel\u27s air strike must be considered an understandable and legitimate act o...
The aim of this thesis is to contribute to the understanding of the nature, status and determinants ...
The U.S. and U.K. attacks on the territory of Afghanistan on 7 October 2001 were not justified as a ...
Do the laws of war govern the September 11 attacks? Did the attacks constitute war crimes ? These q...
The Obama administration has continued to apply the wartime paradigm first developed by the Bush adm...
The 2006 Israel’s military attack on Lebanon raises numerous issues concerning ‘jus ad bellum’ and ‘...
The extensive air strikes launched by Israel on Iranian forces and assets across Syria in the early ...
Transnational terrorism, politically motivated violence that crosses national boundaries, is a tangi...
In the early morning of June 30, 2006, Israeli warplanes struck a civilian apartment complex in Qana...
The United States military strikes against Afghanistan cannot be justified as self-defense under the...
Events that took place on 9/11, when symbols of American nation were destroyed by hijacked civilian ...
The 2006 Israel's military attack on Lebanon raises numerous issues concerning 'jus ad bellum' and '...
The phrase War on Terror has no discrete legal content. It was politically inspired and used by th...
A review of Israel’s sometimes controversial positions on targeting law within the law of armed conf...
This article contrasts and compares the war on terror and the war of terror in the wake of, and befo...
Solarz argued that Israel\u27s air strike must be considered an understandable and legitimate act o...
The aim of this thesis is to contribute to the understanding of the nature, status and determinants ...