Add to ORKGA review of Israel’s sometimes controversial positions on targeting law within the law of armed conflict shows that they are generally reasonable and consistent with mainstream contemporary state practice
The lawfare critique offers a provocative challenge to the use of law and legal process in the conte...
In this essay, Pat Andriola addresses the legality of Israel\u27s Operation Protective Edge launched...
The recent Palestinian uprising in the Israeli Occupied Territories, otherwise known as the Intifada...
abstract: The purpose of this paper is to analyze how Israel justifies its use of targeted killings....
This is an open access article. Content is freely available for download via the Naval War College R...
The present article presents a critical overview of the main legal questions which arise from the Is...
The targeting of non-state armed groups members is perhaps the most debated legal issue in the law o...
The law and operational practice of blockade were considered all but dead by many in the 1990s.1 How...
Israel\u27s occupation of territories it captured in 1967 has become one of the longest and most con...
This Article explores and assesses the Israeli justification for Operation Change Direction. Did the...
With the purpose of providing a context for the eighteen month long Palestinian uprising, this Artic...
The extensive air strikes launched by Israel on Iranian forces and assets across Syria in the early ...
Solarz argued that Israel\u27s air strike must be considered an understandable and legitimate act o...
This dissertation examines the involvement of war lawyers (military lawyers) in targeting operations...
Weapons deals with Israel violate the plain language and policy considerations of United States’ sta...
The lawfare critique offers a provocative challenge to the use of law and legal process in the conte...
In this essay, Pat Andriola addresses the legality of Israel\u27s Operation Protective Edge launched...
The recent Palestinian uprising in the Israeli Occupied Territories, otherwise known as the Intifada...
abstract: The purpose of this paper is to analyze how Israel justifies its use of targeted killings....
This is an open access article. Content is freely available for download via the Naval War College R...
The present article presents a critical overview of the main legal questions which arise from the Is...
The targeting of non-state armed groups members is perhaps the most debated legal issue in the law o...
The law and operational practice of blockade were considered all but dead by many in the 1990s.1 How...
Israel\u27s occupation of territories it captured in 1967 has become one of the longest and most con...
This Article explores and assesses the Israeli justification for Operation Change Direction. Did the...
With the purpose of providing a context for the eighteen month long Palestinian uprising, this Artic...
The extensive air strikes launched by Israel on Iranian forces and assets across Syria in the early ...
Solarz argued that Israel\u27s air strike must be considered an understandable and legitimate act o...
This dissertation examines the involvement of war lawyers (military lawyers) in targeting operations...
Weapons deals with Israel violate the plain language and policy considerations of United States’ sta...
The lawfare critique offers a provocative challenge to the use of law and legal process in the conte...
In this essay, Pat Andriola addresses the legality of Israel\u27s Operation Protective Edge launched...
The recent Palestinian uprising in the Israeli Occupied Territories, otherwise known as the Intifada...