Add to ORKGOn June 24, 2003, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals declared the Environmental Protection Agency’s (“EPA”) authority to issue legally binding administrative compliance orders (“ACOs”) unconstitutional. This decision could foreshadow a broader movement to weaken EPA’s ability to enforce the broad range of environmental and public health statutes that it is responsible for implementing. While this decision undermines EPA’s ability to enforce ACOs, it does not leave EPA completely helpless to enforce environmental laws
The article discusses American Trucking Associations v EPA, in which a two-judge majority of a DC Ci...
In 2011, in response to the ongoing problem of interstate air pollution, EPA promulgated the Transpo...
In Northcoast Environmental Center v. Glickman, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Cir...
Congress amended the Clean Air Act in 1977 because of public concern that enforcement of the Clean A...
In 2003 the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit decided two cases concerning the...
The author discusses the availability of review of administrative orders issued by the Environmental...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit decided cases in 2008 that addressed the...
There is nothing “premature” about judicial review of an executive order that paralyzes federal agen...
In Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation v. EPA, the Supreme Court addressed the issue of ...
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia granted a motion for summary vacatur...
When federal agencies impose regulations on businesses, who decides what those rules actually mean? ...
The U.S. Supreme Court determined the Environmental Protection Agency properly interpreted the “Good...
In Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center, the Supreme Court upheld the EPA’s interpretati...
Enforcement has long been a central component of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) adminis...
On February 28, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments for the landmark West Virginia v. ...
The article discusses American Trucking Associations v EPA, in which a two-judge majority of a DC Ci...
In 2011, in response to the ongoing problem of interstate air pollution, EPA promulgated the Transpo...
In Northcoast Environmental Center v. Glickman, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Cir...
Congress amended the Clean Air Act in 1977 because of public concern that enforcement of the Clean A...
In 2003 the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit decided two cases concerning the...
The author discusses the availability of review of administrative orders issued by the Environmental...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit decided cases in 2008 that addressed the...
There is nothing “premature” about judicial review of an executive order that paralyzes federal agen...
In Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation v. EPA, the Supreme Court addressed the issue of ...
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia granted a motion for summary vacatur...
When federal agencies impose regulations on businesses, who decides what those rules actually mean? ...
The U.S. Supreme Court determined the Environmental Protection Agency properly interpreted the “Good...
In Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center, the Supreme Court upheld the EPA’s interpretati...
Enforcement has long been a central component of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) adminis...
On February 28, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments for the landmark West Virginia v. ...
The article discusses American Trucking Associations v EPA, in which a two-judge majority of a DC Ci...
In 2011, in response to the ongoing problem of interstate air pollution, EPA promulgated the Transpo...
In Northcoast Environmental Center v. Glickman, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Cir...