Ignorance has traditionally been perceived negatively, as a hurdle. Our knowledge inevitably has gaps and blunders, which are gradually filled in as more is discovered. Over the past few decades, agnotologists and epistemologists of ignorance have challenged this standard story emphasizing that ignorance is not merely the culpable absence of information. Ignorance also has a “virtuous” component when a specific inquiry ought to be left untouched. Yet can ignorance become an epistemic virtue in science, a goal in and of itself? This essay shifts the spotlight to a more constructive side of ignorance and its philosophical implications. I begin by distinguishing three kinds of ignorance. Next, I illustrate the claim that ignorance can play a ...