The public debate about GM crops that took place in Britain in 2002–03 was an unprecedented experiment for the UK in public engagement. The Government, which sponsored the exercise, made a pledge: to take into account lay perspectives, as well as the views of its expert advisers, when making a decision about the possible commercialisation of this controversial technology. As officially accredited but independent evaluators of the debate, we were given unique behind-the-scenes access to the organisation and execution of the debate process. In this paper we report on our findings, which reveal a debate process that, whilst innovative, suffered from a number of important flaws: in terms of both design and implementation. These shortcomings in ...
This article reports the findings of a one-year project examining British press coverage of the gene...
AbstractA group of scientists has written to the British prime minister to complain about the govern...
The underlying constructs characterising the never-ending debate and lack of consensus on food are l...
The public debate about GM crops that took place in Britain in 2002–03 was an unprecedented experime...
The outcome of ‘GM Nation?’ — a public debate on genetic modification and the commercial growing of ...
<p>Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.</p>The UK government-spon...
In the realm of risk management, and policy-making more generally, “public engagement” is often advo...
This book tells the story of an unprecedented experiment in public participation: the government-spo...
In the realm of risk management, and policy-making more generally, “public engagement...
This paper analyses a corpus of articles on GM crops and food which appeared in six UK newspapers in...
This article takes as its case study the “GM Nation?” public debate, a major participation process o...
The UK GM debate of 2003-2004 demonstrates how difficult genetic modification was to contain as one...
AbstractBiotech companies are now pressing Europe to give the go-ahead for commercial planting of ge...
This article reports the findings of a one-year project examining British press coverage of the gene...
This paper takes issue with a particular conception of public participation operationalised in the ‘...
This article reports the findings of a one-year project examining British press coverage of the gene...
AbstractA group of scientists has written to the British prime minister to complain about the govern...
The underlying constructs characterising the never-ending debate and lack of consensus on food are l...
The public debate about GM crops that took place in Britain in 2002–03 was an unprecedented experime...
The outcome of ‘GM Nation?’ — a public debate on genetic modification and the commercial growing of ...
<p>Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.</p>The UK government-spon...
In the realm of risk management, and policy-making more generally, “public engagement” is often advo...
This book tells the story of an unprecedented experiment in public participation: the government-spo...
In the realm of risk management, and policy-making more generally, “public engagement...
This paper analyses a corpus of articles on GM crops and food which appeared in six UK newspapers in...
This article takes as its case study the “GM Nation?” public debate, a major participation process o...
The UK GM debate of 2003-2004 demonstrates how difficult genetic modification was to contain as one...
AbstractBiotech companies are now pressing Europe to give the go-ahead for commercial planting of ge...
This article reports the findings of a one-year project examining British press coverage of the gene...
This paper takes issue with a particular conception of public participation operationalised in the ‘...
This article reports the findings of a one-year project examining British press coverage of the gene...
AbstractA group of scientists has written to the British prime minister to complain about the govern...
The underlying constructs characterising the never-ending debate and lack of consensus on food are l...