Additional file 1: Table S1. Log from ContID. Table S2. Summary of metric. Table S3. Pre-compute summary. Table S4. Compute test for target sample. Table S5. compute test for alien. Table S6. Manual prediction (no BSV and > 5reads)
Table S15. The predictive performance of VirMiner in the metagenomic data from Tara Oceans samples. ...
Table S13. The predictive performance of the method for phage contig identification in Paez-Espino e...
An Excel table of Sequence statistics. Read count and base pairs for the different step in the seque...
Effect of laboratory and sequencing center variables on the probability of contamination, with the m...
Table S3. The number of putative metagenomic phage contigs and non-phage contigs in metagenomic asse...
Table S9. Comparison with VirMiner, VirSorter, and VirFinder for contigs >â1âkb based on reads r...
Effect of laboratory metadata, at least ten reads per contaminant. See legend to Fig. 3. Here, at l...
Table S8. Comparison with VirMiner, VirSorter, and VirFinder for contigs >â3âkb based on reads r...
Contaminant species-associated statistics. Each dot is for a contaminant species, that is, a species...
Table S7. Comparison with VirMiner, VirSorter, and VirFinder for contigs >â5âkb based on reads r...
Table S5. Predictive performance of VirMiner for contigs >â3âkb based on reads ratio of correctl...
Table S1. Sample information of human gut microbial metagenomic data and matched phageomes used in t...
Table S14. The paired viral-microbial metagenomic data from Tara Oceans samples used in this study. ...
Table S6. Predictive performance of VirMiner for contigs >â1âkb based on reads ratio of correctl...
Table S4. Predictive performance of VirMiner for contigs >â5âkb based on reads ratio of correctl...
Table S15. The predictive performance of VirMiner in the metagenomic data from Tara Oceans samples. ...
Table S13. The predictive performance of the method for phage contig identification in Paez-Espino e...
An Excel table of Sequence statistics. Read count and base pairs for the different step in the seque...
Effect of laboratory and sequencing center variables on the probability of contamination, with the m...
Table S3. The number of putative metagenomic phage contigs and non-phage contigs in metagenomic asse...
Table S9. Comparison with VirMiner, VirSorter, and VirFinder for contigs >â1âkb based on reads r...
Effect of laboratory metadata, at least ten reads per contaminant. See legend to Fig. 3. Here, at l...
Table S8. Comparison with VirMiner, VirSorter, and VirFinder for contigs >â3âkb based on reads r...
Contaminant species-associated statistics. Each dot is for a contaminant species, that is, a species...
Table S7. Comparison with VirMiner, VirSorter, and VirFinder for contigs >â5âkb based on reads r...
Table S5. Predictive performance of VirMiner for contigs >â3âkb based on reads ratio of correctl...
Table S1. Sample information of human gut microbial metagenomic data and matched phageomes used in t...
Table S14. The paired viral-microbial metagenomic data from Tara Oceans samples used in this study. ...
Table S6. Predictive performance of VirMiner for contigs >â1âkb based on reads ratio of correctl...
Table S4. Predictive performance of VirMiner for contigs >â5âkb based on reads ratio of correctl...
Table S15. The predictive performance of VirMiner in the metagenomic data from Tara Oceans samples. ...
Table S13. The predictive performance of the method for phage contig identification in Paez-Espino e...
An Excel table of Sequence statistics. Read count and base pairs for the different step in the seque...
DOI
Add to ORKG