I aspire to answer two questions regarding the concept of a corrective duty. The first is what it means to wrong others, thus triggering a demand for corrections (the ground question). The second concerns the proper content of corrective duties. I first illustrate how three prominent accounts of corrective du-ties – the Aristotelian model of correlativity, the Kantian idea that wronging corresponds to the violation of others’ right to freedom, and the more recent continuity view – have failed to answer the two ques-tions satisfactorily. I then introduce my proposal, which holds that we wrong others when we fail to treat their status as a moral agent as a source of stringent constraints on our action. I call it the moral neglect account. Onc...