Add to ORKGPart of NYU Journal of Legislation & Public Policy Fall 2014 symposium: Courts, Campaigns, and Corruption: Judicial Recusal Five Years after Caperton . The panels can be watched here
From assaying 200 years of judicial review - Is it good? Is it constitutional? - to trying to peer t...
In his thoughtful and provocative article, Professor Ronald Rotunda offers several arguments against...
Two reasons may support the result in Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co. First, though Caperton may i...
Part of NYU Journal of Legislation & Public Policy Fall 2014 symposium: Courts, Campaigns, and Corr...
On November 14, 2014, a symposium entitled, Courts, Campaigns, and Corruption: Judicial Recusal Fiv...
The article looks at a panel discussion on judicial responsibility and the U.S. Supreme Court\u27s d...
This symposium article asserts that Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co. is correct in result; correct i...
In June of 2009, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled for the first time that an elected judge must recuse h...
When Caperton v. Massey came before the U.S. Supreme Court in June 2009, the Court ruled that the du...
A roundtable panel discussion at the Chautauqua Institution. The panel brought together five lawyers...
It is virtually impossible to discuss the Supreme Court’s decision in Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal C...
Marc Galanter\u27s essay, Why the Haves Come out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change...
Professors Lonnie Brown, Dan Coenen and Anne Dupre (J.D.\u2788) are selected by the students as the ...
This book presents an extraordinary collection of research on the courts. The quality and importance...
This Article identifies a new and previously unrecognized trend in class-action settlements: release...
From assaying 200 years of judicial review - Is it good? Is it constitutional? - to trying to peer t...
In his thoughtful and provocative article, Professor Ronald Rotunda offers several arguments against...
Two reasons may support the result in Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co. First, though Caperton may i...
Part of NYU Journal of Legislation & Public Policy Fall 2014 symposium: Courts, Campaigns, and Corr...
On November 14, 2014, a symposium entitled, Courts, Campaigns, and Corruption: Judicial Recusal Fiv...
The article looks at a panel discussion on judicial responsibility and the U.S. Supreme Court\u27s d...
This symposium article asserts that Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co. is correct in result; correct i...
In June of 2009, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled for the first time that an elected judge must recuse h...
When Caperton v. Massey came before the U.S. Supreme Court in June 2009, the Court ruled that the du...
A roundtable panel discussion at the Chautauqua Institution. The panel brought together five lawyers...
It is virtually impossible to discuss the Supreme Court’s decision in Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal C...
Marc Galanter\u27s essay, Why the Haves Come out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change...
Professors Lonnie Brown, Dan Coenen and Anne Dupre (J.D.\u2788) are selected by the students as the ...
This book presents an extraordinary collection of research on the courts. The quality and importance...
This Article identifies a new and previously unrecognized trend in class-action settlements: release...
From assaying 200 years of judicial review - Is it good? Is it constitutional? - to trying to peer t...
In his thoughtful and provocative article, Professor Ronald Rotunda offers several arguments against...
Two reasons may support the result in Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co. First, though Caperton may i...