THE SEABED AND THE SOUTH: FROM STOCK STORIES TO NEW HISTORIES OF INTERNATIONAL LAWMAKING

Centering the career of Cameroonian diplomat Paul Bamela Engo during the negotiation of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, this article makes a methodological intervention in the historiography of multilateral treaty-making. It reads through and against the grain of dominant narratives of oceanic constitution-making, and offers counter-narratives that serve as conceptual and mobilizational resources in contemporary struggles. It examines how the ‘stock story’ of the emergence of the resource regime for seabed minerals as the common heritage of mankind erases the radical alternatives that were proposed by Third World actors and their efforts to write them into law and sorts these actors into trope-laden categories of ‘extremist’ and ‘moderate’. Against this, and building on critical race theorist Richard Delgado’s exploration of counterstorytelling, it traces histories that position Third World diplomats and lawyers as intellectual innovators and rival worldmakers. These histories extend the field of international intellectual history, examine international lawmaking conferences as a political form, link UNCLOS to wider anticolonial and worldmaking projects, and connect analyses at multiple spatial and temporal scales to offer a fresh and empirically-grounded approach to the agency and structural constraints of Third World actors negotiating international legal orders.The paper was completed during a fellowship at the Wissenschaftskolleg, Berlin