Luke in the preface of his Gospel says that he is going to write ‘in an orderly account’ (Lk 1:3). However, scholars have no consensus about the kind of order Luke is seeking. Many believe that Luke writes as a historian. Because Greco-Roman historians seem to have a practice to indicate in their prefaces the writing methodologies of their writings, this article aims to ascertain Luke’s writing order through a comparison of Luke’s two prefaces with those in the writings of the Greco-Roman historians. This article proposes that Luke most likely adopts the common writing methodologies of the Greco-Roman historians and writes in chronological order
In light of socio-rhetorical criticism, Luke's LS account emerges as rhetorical discourse both by it...
This thesis examines the viability of the Farrer theory of how The Gospel According to Luke was writ...
Throughout the past century, much attention has been given to the study of the speeches in Acts. For...
CITATION: Du Plooy, G. P. V. 1990. The autor in Luke-Acts. Scriptura, 32:28-35, doi:10.7833/32-0-188...
This thesis investigates how understandings of history in diverse texts of the Graeco-Roman period i...
Ancient authors and readers did not work with manuscripts the way we work with printed texts. It is ...
Contemporary scholarship recognises Luke's Gospel and Acts of the Apostles as two volumes of Luke's ...
The preface to Luke's gospel (Lk. 1:1-4), when properly exegeted, says this: "(1) Since many have un...
grantor: University of St. Michael's CollegeThis dissertation investigates the ways in whi...
Adams argues that the closest parallels to Luke’s preface are found in the corpus of ancient classic...
In the present article the author studies the episode of Jesus\u27appearance before Herod Antipas (L...
This thesis will focus upon the narratives of three Middle Byzantine historians, Michael Psellos, An...
If Luke’s first audience understood the Gospel as a biography, what would their experience of the te...
The Gospel of Luke has long been known for its variation between good, educated Greek and Semitic in...
This thesis evaluates the significance of the phenomenon of order (i.e., the pattern of agreement an...
In light of socio-rhetorical criticism, Luke's LS account emerges as rhetorical discourse both by it...
This thesis examines the viability of the Farrer theory of how The Gospel According to Luke was writ...
Throughout the past century, much attention has been given to the study of the speeches in Acts. For...
CITATION: Du Plooy, G. P. V. 1990. The autor in Luke-Acts. Scriptura, 32:28-35, doi:10.7833/32-0-188...
This thesis investigates how understandings of history in diverse texts of the Graeco-Roman period i...
Ancient authors and readers did not work with manuscripts the way we work with printed texts. It is ...
Contemporary scholarship recognises Luke's Gospel and Acts of the Apostles as two volumes of Luke's ...
The preface to Luke's gospel (Lk. 1:1-4), when properly exegeted, says this: "(1) Since many have un...
grantor: University of St. Michael's CollegeThis dissertation investigates the ways in whi...
Adams argues that the closest parallels to Luke’s preface are found in the corpus of ancient classic...
In the present article the author studies the episode of Jesus\u27appearance before Herod Antipas (L...
This thesis will focus upon the narratives of three Middle Byzantine historians, Michael Psellos, An...
If Luke’s first audience understood the Gospel as a biography, what would their experience of the te...
The Gospel of Luke has long been known for its variation between good, educated Greek and Semitic in...
This thesis evaluates the significance of the phenomenon of order (i.e., the pattern of agreement an...
In light of socio-rhetorical criticism, Luke's LS account emerges as rhetorical discourse both by it...
This thesis examines the viability of the Farrer theory of how The Gospel According to Luke was writ...
Throughout the past century, much attention has been given to the study of the speeches in Acts. For...