We design an experiment to test the hypothesis that, in violation of Bayes’ rule, some people respond more forcefully to the strength of information than to its weight. We provide incentives to motivate effort, use naturally occurring information, and control for risk attitude. We find that the strength–weight bias affects expectations but that its magnitude is significantly lower than originally reported. Controls for nonlinear utility further reduce the bias. Our results suggest that incentive compatibility and controls for risk attitude considerably affect inferences on errors in expectations
Decisions in management and finance rely on information that often includes win-lose feedback (e.g.,...
Much of the evidence supporting the Ellsberg's paradox comes from experiments on individual choice a...
We report the results of two pre-registered experiments designed to study the reinforcement paradox:...
We design an experiment to test the hypothesis that, in violation of Bayes’ rule, some people respon...
We design an experiment to test the hypothesis that, in violation of Bayes’ rule, some people respon...
We design an experiment to test the hypothesis that, in violation of Bayes Rule, some people respond...
We test whether the rejections of the expectations hypothesis can be explained by two behavioral bia...
International audienceMost studies on the role of incentives on risk attitude report data obtained f...
Optimistic beliefs affect important areas of economic decision making, yet direct knowledge on how b...
Evidence from social psychology suggests that agents process information about their own ability in ...
We present an experiment where subjects sequentially receive signals about the true state of the wor...
Bayes’ statistical rule remains the status quo for modeling belief updating in both normative and d...
When confronted with new information, rational decision makers should update their beliefs through B...
Economists and psychologists have recently been developing new theories of decision making under unc...
A large literature suggests that many individuals do not apply Bayes’ Rule when making decisions tha...
Decisions in management and finance rely on information that often includes win-lose feedback (e.g.,...
Much of the evidence supporting the Ellsberg's paradox comes from experiments on individual choice a...
We report the results of two pre-registered experiments designed to study the reinforcement paradox:...
We design an experiment to test the hypothesis that, in violation of Bayes’ rule, some people respon...
We design an experiment to test the hypothesis that, in violation of Bayes’ rule, some people respon...
We design an experiment to test the hypothesis that, in violation of Bayes Rule, some people respond...
We test whether the rejections of the expectations hypothesis can be explained by two behavioral bia...
International audienceMost studies on the role of incentives on risk attitude report data obtained f...
Optimistic beliefs affect important areas of economic decision making, yet direct knowledge on how b...
Evidence from social psychology suggests that agents process information about their own ability in ...
We present an experiment where subjects sequentially receive signals about the true state of the wor...
Bayes’ statistical rule remains the status quo for modeling belief updating in both normative and d...
When confronted with new information, rational decision makers should update their beliefs through B...
Economists and psychologists have recently been developing new theories of decision making under unc...
A large literature suggests that many individuals do not apply Bayes’ Rule when making decisions tha...
Decisions in management and finance rely on information that often includes win-lose feedback (e.g.,...
Much of the evidence supporting the Ellsberg's paradox comes from experiments on individual choice a...
We report the results of two pre-registered experiments designed to study the reinforcement paradox:...