In different ways and from different angles, the participants in this special issue critically probe the conceptual and normative underpinnings of the model of legal order developed in to Authority and the Globalisation of Inclusion and Exclusion and other writings. This offers me the opportunity to flesh out these underpinnings more fully and to draw out some of their implications which were not discussed in the book. In particular, my response focuses on the concepts of, and systematic relation between, representation, recognition, constituent power, equality, restrained collective self-assertion, and a-legality
In this article I address two objections to Rawls’ account of international toleration. The first cl...
In this review essay I discuss some of the aspects that I think are opportunities to further develop...
This contribution develops two objections to Hans Lindahl’s legal philosophy, as exhibited in his Au...
In different ways and from different angles, the participants in this special issue critically probe...
The paper is a response to H.Lindahl’s extensive reply to Ferrara’s critical remarks. This reply was...
In this brief comment, I deal with the role of constituent power in Hans Lindahl’s considerations o...
Alessandro Ferrara has raised four sets of issues about the model of legal order I have developed in...
This article offers a reply to the criticisms and challenges posed by Camila Vergara, Miguel Vatter,...
Back to Government?: The Pluralistic Deficit in the Decisionmaking Processes and Before the Courts, ...
The author argues that in Lindahl’s Authority and the Globalisation of Inclusion and Exclusion, and...
Authority is written against the background of intense resistance to globalization processes by a ra...
This essay responds to Virgílio Afonso da Silva, Alon Harel, and Iddo Porat, who offered critical co...
This commentary addresses Lindahl’s discussion of asymmetrical recognition and his critique of lega...
In my reply to critics I address a raft of issues raised by the commentators to Fault Lines of Globa...
Journal Special Issue: (Re)Imagining Alterity in the 21st CenturyA book review of Law and Outsiders:...
In this article I address two objections to Rawls’ account of international toleration. The first cl...
In this review essay I discuss some of the aspects that I think are opportunities to further develop...
This contribution develops two objections to Hans Lindahl’s legal philosophy, as exhibited in his Au...
In different ways and from different angles, the participants in this special issue critically probe...
The paper is a response to H.Lindahl’s extensive reply to Ferrara’s critical remarks. This reply was...
In this brief comment, I deal with the role of constituent power in Hans Lindahl’s considerations o...
Alessandro Ferrara has raised four sets of issues about the model of legal order I have developed in...
This article offers a reply to the criticisms and challenges posed by Camila Vergara, Miguel Vatter,...
Back to Government?: The Pluralistic Deficit in the Decisionmaking Processes and Before the Courts, ...
The author argues that in Lindahl’s Authority and the Globalisation of Inclusion and Exclusion, and...
Authority is written against the background of intense resistance to globalization processes by a ra...
This essay responds to Virgílio Afonso da Silva, Alon Harel, and Iddo Porat, who offered critical co...
This commentary addresses Lindahl’s discussion of asymmetrical recognition and his critique of lega...
In my reply to critics I address a raft of issues raised by the commentators to Fault Lines of Globa...
Journal Special Issue: (Re)Imagining Alterity in the 21st CenturyA book review of Law and Outsiders:...
In this article I address two objections to Rawls’ account of international toleration. The first cl...
In this review essay I discuss some of the aspects that I think are opportunities to further develop...
This contribution develops two objections to Hans Lindahl’s legal philosophy, as exhibited in his Au...