A) Colony Forming Units per axis location, B) Colony Forming Units per each distance, C) Colony Forming Units per device. Mean differences between groups with Kruskall Wallis and post hoc using Mann-Whitney U multiple comparison test.</p
Batch culture data associated to Figure 1, Figure 3, Figure S3 and Figure S7. Data correspond to col...
<p>Statistical comparison between histograms of cluster sizes for the different strains.</p
<p>Colony longevity was inferred from a mixture of survival analyses and extinction analyses. + indi...
A) Colony Forming Units per axis location, B) Colony Forming Units per each distance, C) Colony Form...
Box-plot distribution of the data of the different groups tested for the evaluation of colony-formin...
<p>The first part displays the averages per site, the second part the differences between the sites ...
<p>CFU/colony was determined following serial dilution plating of five colonies per strain. Top, mid...
<p>The first image in (A) is the original image. The rest are processed images from the colony detec...
<p>(A) shows the original image, and masks/overlays of detected colonies by various methods. (B) Plo...
<p>Four peri-bracket sites includes: occlusal regions along the bracket (BO), gingival region along ...
<p>The middle line represents the mean difference of methods. Dotted lines above and below represent...
Same low caption letter means no statistical significant difference per surface condition analyzed. ...
<p>Land use classes with significant differences between the Landscape Units obtained by the cluster...
Kruskal-Wallis test with post-hoc pairwise Wilcoxon was used to identify significant differences (p ...
<p>Wilcoxon Rank tests were performed for G1 and G2 within generation comparisons and Kruskal-Wallis...
Batch culture data associated to Figure 1, Figure 3, Figure S3 and Figure S7. Data correspond to col...
<p>Statistical comparison between histograms of cluster sizes for the different strains.</p
<p>Colony longevity was inferred from a mixture of survival analyses and extinction analyses. + indi...
A) Colony Forming Units per axis location, B) Colony Forming Units per each distance, C) Colony Form...
Box-plot distribution of the data of the different groups tested for the evaluation of colony-formin...
<p>The first part displays the averages per site, the second part the differences between the sites ...
<p>CFU/colony was determined following serial dilution plating of five colonies per strain. Top, mid...
<p>The first image in (A) is the original image. The rest are processed images from the colony detec...
<p>(A) shows the original image, and masks/overlays of detected colonies by various methods. (B) Plo...
<p>Four peri-bracket sites includes: occlusal regions along the bracket (BO), gingival region along ...
<p>The middle line represents the mean difference of methods. Dotted lines above and below represent...
Same low caption letter means no statistical significant difference per surface condition analyzed. ...
<p>Land use classes with significant differences between the Landscape Units obtained by the cluster...
Kruskal-Wallis test with post-hoc pairwise Wilcoxon was used to identify significant differences (p ...
<p>Wilcoxon Rank tests were performed for G1 and G2 within generation comparisons and Kruskal-Wallis...
Batch culture data associated to Figure 1, Figure 3, Figure S3 and Figure S7. Data correspond to col...
<p>Statistical comparison between histograms of cluster sizes for the different strains.</p
<p>Colony longevity was inferred from a mixture of survival analyses and extinction analyses. + indi...