Add to ORKGJust over a decade ago, with the introduction of a unified approach to substantive review, the Supreme Court of Canada significantly modified administrative law. More recently, the law on substantive review has been transformed once again through Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick, with some further elaboration in Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Khosa. This article examines the latest changes in the jurisprudence. By way of background, Part I provides a brief overview of the unified approach inaugurated by Pushpanathan v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) and Baker v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration). Part II describes the new framework for appeals and judicial review set out in Dunsmuir, as well as...
This thesis examines the concept of “deference” in relation to judicial review of administrative dec...
This article examines two key administrative law decisions of the 2008-2009 Supreme Court of Canada ...
This thesis surveys the last three decades of Canadian jurisprudence on the standards of review appl...
Just over a decade ago, with the introduction of a unified approach to substantive review, the Supre...
This is the first in a series of three articles undertaking an in-depth study of Canadian judicial r...
In Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick, the Supreme Court re-examined its approach to judicial review of admin...
The 2007-2008 term was a landmark year in Canadian administrative law. The Supreme Court of Canada d...
Although the Supreme Court of Canada’s seminal decision in Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick has now been ci...
Canada’s leading practitioners, judges, and academics examine the legacy of Dunsmuir. Ten years afte...
This is the second in a series of three articles examining substantive review of administrative deci...
The substantive law of judicial review of administrative action has grown in leaps and bounds in rec...
Diana Ginn and Gregory Johannson The recent Supreme Court of Canada decision Mouvement laique qudbic...
Administrative law focusses on the way in which, and the extent to which, courts should oversee the ...
In a 1998 decision, Pushpanathan v Canada, the Supreme Court of Canada synthesized and revised the p...
This paper examines the surprising resurgence of the Bill of Rights in procedural fairness cases bef...
This thesis examines the concept of “deference” in relation to judicial review of administrative dec...
This article examines two key administrative law decisions of the 2008-2009 Supreme Court of Canada ...
This thesis surveys the last three decades of Canadian jurisprudence on the standards of review appl...
Just over a decade ago, with the introduction of a unified approach to substantive review, the Supre...
This is the first in a series of three articles undertaking an in-depth study of Canadian judicial r...
In Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick, the Supreme Court re-examined its approach to judicial review of admin...
The 2007-2008 term was a landmark year in Canadian administrative law. The Supreme Court of Canada d...
Although the Supreme Court of Canada’s seminal decision in Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick has now been ci...
Canada’s leading practitioners, judges, and academics examine the legacy of Dunsmuir. Ten years afte...
This is the second in a series of three articles examining substantive review of administrative deci...
The substantive law of judicial review of administrative action has grown in leaps and bounds in rec...
Diana Ginn and Gregory Johannson The recent Supreme Court of Canada decision Mouvement laique qudbic...
Administrative law focusses on the way in which, and the extent to which, courts should oversee the ...
In a 1998 decision, Pushpanathan v Canada, the Supreme Court of Canada synthesized and revised the p...
This paper examines the surprising resurgence of the Bill of Rights in procedural fairness cases bef...
This thesis examines the concept of “deference” in relation to judicial review of administrative dec...
This article examines two key administrative law decisions of the 2008-2009 Supreme Court of Canada ...
This thesis surveys the last three decades of Canadian jurisprudence on the standards of review appl...