Animals have been almost entirely absent from scholarly appraisals of the ethics of war. Just-war theory concerns when communities may permissibly resort to war; who may wage war; who they may harm in war; and what kinds of harm they may cause. Each question can be complicated by animals’ inclusion. After introducing just-war theory and the argument for an animal-inclusive just-war theory, this paper reviews ethical appraisals of war on animals’ behalf and wars against animals. It then turns to consider harm to and use of animals in war. It concludes by considering questions in the ethics of war beyond just-war theory as traditionally construed.</p
In this article the predominant, purely theoretical perspectives on animal ethics are questioned and...
The three Rs of Russell and Burch - Reduce, Replace, Refine - are widely agreed maxims of animal-bas...
Although reflecting a long tradition of moral reflection that the use of animals is acceptable as lo...
War is harmful to animals, but few have considered how such harm should affect assessments of the ju...
Non-human animals suffer greatly and are exploited in numerous ways by humans. This is a grave injus...
Adopting the Clausewitzean (1968) argument that the aim of war is the complete domination of the ‘op...
Militarisation of conservation (sometimes known as 'green militarisation') is an issue of growing in...
The main purposes of this article are to assess whether the existing rules of the law of armed confl...
How should political communities govern their relations with animals? Are animals owed justice? What...
Animal rights advocates reject the use of animals for commercial or scientific purposes. According t...
This paper explores the international implications of liberal theories which extend justice to senti...
Faculty-authored chapter: Is Just War Theory Obsolete? by Jeff Whitman This new Handbook offers a...
The law of war contains a hidden foundation. This foundation is species war. In this paper I begin t...
This volume brings together essays by seminal figures and rising stars in the fields of animal ethic...
An adequate theory of rights ought to forbid the harming of animals (human or nonhuman) to promote t...
In this article the predominant, purely theoretical perspectives on animal ethics are questioned and...
The three Rs of Russell and Burch - Reduce, Replace, Refine - are widely agreed maxims of animal-bas...
Although reflecting a long tradition of moral reflection that the use of animals is acceptable as lo...
War is harmful to animals, but few have considered how such harm should affect assessments of the ju...
Non-human animals suffer greatly and are exploited in numerous ways by humans. This is a grave injus...
Adopting the Clausewitzean (1968) argument that the aim of war is the complete domination of the ‘op...
Militarisation of conservation (sometimes known as 'green militarisation') is an issue of growing in...
The main purposes of this article are to assess whether the existing rules of the law of armed confl...
How should political communities govern their relations with animals? Are animals owed justice? What...
Animal rights advocates reject the use of animals for commercial or scientific purposes. According t...
This paper explores the international implications of liberal theories which extend justice to senti...
Faculty-authored chapter: Is Just War Theory Obsolete? by Jeff Whitman This new Handbook offers a...
The law of war contains a hidden foundation. This foundation is species war. In this paper I begin t...
This volume brings together essays by seminal figures and rising stars in the fields of animal ethic...
An adequate theory of rights ought to forbid the harming of animals (human or nonhuman) to promote t...
In this article the predominant, purely theoretical perspectives on animal ethics are questioned and...
The three Rs of Russell and Burch - Reduce, Replace, Refine - are widely agreed maxims of animal-bas...
Although reflecting a long tradition of moral reflection that the use of animals is acceptable as lo...