An adequate theory of rights ought to forbid the harming of animals (human or nonhuman) to promote trivial interests of humans, as is often done in the animal-user industries. But what should the rights view say about situations in which harming some animals is necessary to prevent intolerable injustices to other animals? I develop an account of respectful treatment on which, under certain conditions, it’s justified to intentionally harm some individuals to prevent serious harm to others. This can be compatible with recognizing the inherent value of the ones who are harmed. My theory has important implications for contemporary moral issues in nonhuman animal ethics, such as the development of cultured meat and animal research
Animal suffering, therefore, is only one aspect of animal exploitation and abuse. Recognizing this, ...
In recent years numerous questions were raised about the morality of killing and eating animals. Do ...
Moral and political philosophers no longer condemn harm inflicted on nonhuman animals as self-eviden...
An adequate theory of rights ought to forbid the harming of animals (human or nonhuman) to promote t...
It is tempting to think that zebras, goats, lions, and similar animals matter morally, but not in qu...
Non-human animals suffer greatly and are exploited in numerous ways by humans. This is a grave injus...
In my view, the moral case for giving animals legal protection is strong. This is so whether or not ...
Alasdair Cochrane introduces an entirely new theory of animal rights grounded in their interests as ...
Businesses and professions must stay in accord with social ethics, or risk losing their autonomy.A m...
Businesses and professions must stay in accord with social ethics, or risk losing their autonomy. A ...
Taking a broad approach, this book considers the killing and harming of animals in an international ...
This volume brings together essays by seminal figures and rising stars in the fields of animal ethic...
Do animals have rights? Almost everyone believes in animal rights, at least in some minimal sense; t...
Animal rights advocates reject the use of animals for commercial or scientific purposes. According t...
Reportedly ever since Pythagoras, but possibly much earlier, humans have been concerned about the wa...
Animal suffering, therefore, is only one aspect of animal exploitation and abuse. Recognizing this, ...
In recent years numerous questions were raised about the morality of killing and eating animals. Do ...
Moral and political philosophers no longer condemn harm inflicted on nonhuman animals as self-eviden...
An adequate theory of rights ought to forbid the harming of animals (human or nonhuman) to promote t...
It is tempting to think that zebras, goats, lions, and similar animals matter morally, but not in qu...
Non-human animals suffer greatly and are exploited in numerous ways by humans. This is a grave injus...
In my view, the moral case for giving animals legal protection is strong. This is so whether or not ...
Alasdair Cochrane introduces an entirely new theory of animal rights grounded in their interests as ...
Businesses and professions must stay in accord with social ethics, or risk losing their autonomy.A m...
Businesses and professions must stay in accord with social ethics, or risk losing their autonomy. A ...
Taking a broad approach, this book considers the killing and harming of animals in an international ...
This volume brings together essays by seminal figures and rising stars in the fields of animal ethic...
Do animals have rights? Almost everyone believes in animal rights, at least in some minimal sense; t...
Animal rights advocates reject the use of animals for commercial or scientific purposes. According t...
Reportedly ever since Pythagoras, but possibly much earlier, humans have been concerned about the wa...
Animal suffering, therefore, is only one aspect of animal exploitation and abuse. Recognizing this, ...
In recent years numerous questions were raised about the morality of killing and eating animals. Do ...
Moral and political philosophers no longer condemn harm inflicted on nonhuman animals as self-eviden...