Add to ORKGThe editors of Hastings Law Journal have invited me to comment on Professor Brian Leiter’s provocative essay, Constitutional Law, Moral Judgment, and the Supreme Court as Super-Legislature, and I have undertaken to do so, not so much because I disagree with what he says—in fact, I agree with much of his thesis—but because what he says points to questions which deserve further consideration. .
Academic life can be a depressing experience. Despite the enormous amount of time many academics spe...
Almost a hundred years ago, the American Association of University Professors established guidelines...
I propose to defend and explore three claims in this Essay. First, there is very little actual “law”...
The editors of Hastings Law Journal have invited me to comment on Professor Brian Leiter’s provocati...
In a series of powerful and challenging articles emerging since the mid-1990s, Brian Leiter has argu...
In 1985, I published in the Michigan Law Review a review of a recent book by Professor Robert S. Sum...
Brian Leiter’s new book Naturalizing Jurisprudence, a collection of essays published over the past t...
Professor Brilmayer responds to the commentaries of Professors Laycock, Tushnet, and George
One of Professor Lawson’s first students, alluding to a 1985 article with the provocative title “Why...
In this Essay, I respond briefly to 18 articles contributed to this special Festschrift issue of the...
In this essay reviewing Brian Leiter’s recent book Naturalizing Jurisprudence, I focus on two positi...
In this essay Professor Deutsch examines the legitimacy of judicial review, in part as a response to...
Authors rarely have the opportunity to respond to their reviewers in the same issue in which the rev...
This is an interdisciplinary Journal. It is based in law. Law, the nurture of all disciplines, serve...
In this article, the author replies to critiques of his book, Constitutional Goods (Oxford, 2004) by...
Academic life can be a depressing experience. Despite the enormous amount of time many academics spe...
Almost a hundred years ago, the American Association of University Professors established guidelines...
I propose to defend and explore three claims in this Essay. First, there is very little actual “law”...
The editors of Hastings Law Journal have invited me to comment on Professor Brian Leiter’s provocati...
In a series of powerful and challenging articles emerging since the mid-1990s, Brian Leiter has argu...
In 1985, I published in the Michigan Law Review a review of a recent book by Professor Robert S. Sum...
Brian Leiter’s new book Naturalizing Jurisprudence, a collection of essays published over the past t...
Professor Brilmayer responds to the commentaries of Professors Laycock, Tushnet, and George
One of Professor Lawson’s first students, alluding to a 1985 article with the provocative title “Why...
In this Essay, I respond briefly to 18 articles contributed to this special Festschrift issue of the...
In this essay reviewing Brian Leiter’s recent book Naturalizing Jurisprudence, I focus on two positi...
In this essay Professor Deutsch examines the legitimacy of judicial review, in part as a response to...
Authors rarely have the opportunity to respond to their reviewers in the same issue in which the rev...
This is an interdisciplinary Journal. It is based in law. Law, the nurture of all disciplines, serve...
In this article, the author replies to critiques of his book, Constitutional Goods (Oxford, 2004) by...
Academic life can be a depressing experience. Despite the enormous amount of time many academics spe...
Almost a hundred years ago, the American Association of University Professors established guidelines...
I propose to defend and explore three claims in this Essay. First, there is very little actual “law”...