Add to ORKGAuthors rarely have the opportunity to respond to their reviewers in the same issue in which the review is published, so I am grateful to the Cornell Law Review for inviting me to do so and to Trevor Morrison for graciously agreeing. I am also appreciative of the respectful tone that Professor Morrison employs in his comments on a book with which he so obviously disagrees. Coming from a critic, the positive qualities he attributes to Restoring the Lost Constitution: The Presumption of Liberty are especially significant. Yet he does disagree with me, which means that I disagree with him, and in this response I will explain why
In this review, by concentrating on the general aim of Dworkin\u27s book, I hope to contribute to th...
In this Book Review, Professor Fleming examines Professor Tushnet\u27s arguments against judicial su...
I am very grateful to Ton Jörg for his discussion of my book Good education in an age of measurement...
Authors rarely have the opportunity to respond to their reviewers in the same issue in which the rev...
It is a privilege to participate in this exchange with Bruce Frohnen concerning our books. In my Fid...
In 1985, I published in the Michigan Law Review a review of a recent book by Professor Robert S. Sum...
Academic life can be a depressing experience. Despite the enormous amount of time many academics spe...
Reply to comments and critics of the book "Comparative Constitutional Reasoning" (Cambridge Universi...
Herewith a response to Jeremy Waldron\u27s review of my book, On Constitutional Disobedience. I conc...
Professor Lobel premises his review on a flattering, but ultimately ill-chosen, comparison between m...
The author addresses issues raised by commentators on his book, Philosophy of Law (2011)
The editors of Hastings Law Journal have invited me to comment on Professor Brian Leiter’s provocati...
Professor Lobel premises his review on a flattering, but ultimately illchosen, comparison between my...
In this article, the author replies to critiques of his book, Constitutional Goods (Oxford, 2004) by...
Book review of John Laws, The Constitutional Balance Oxford: Hart Publishing (www.bloomsburyprofessi...
In this review, by concentrating on the general aim of Dworkin\u27s book, I hope to contribute to th...
In this Book Review, Professor Fleming examines Professor Tushnet\u27s arguments against judicial su...
I am very grateful to Ton Jörg for his discussion of my book Good education in an age of measurement...
Authors rarely have the opportunity to respond to their reviewers in the same issue in which the rev...
It is a privilege to participate in this exchange with Bruce Frohnen concerning our books. In my Fid...
In 1985, I published in the Michigan Law Review a review of a recent book by Professor Robert S. Sum...
Academic life can be a depressing experience. Despite the enormous amount of time many academics spe...
Reply to comments and critics of the book "Comparative Constitutional Reasoning" (Cambridge Universi...
Herewith a response to Jeremy Waldron\u27s review of my book, On Constitutional Disobedience. I conc...
Professor Lobel premises his review on a flattering, but ultimately ill-chosen, comparison between m...
The author addresses issues raised by commentators on his book, Philosophy of Law (2011)
The editors of Hastings Law Journal have invited me to comment on Professor Brian Leiter’s provocati...
Professor Lobel premises his review on a flattering, but ultimately illchosen, comparison between my...
In this article, the author replies to critiques of his book, Constitutional Goods (Oxford, 2004) by...
Book review of John Laws, The Constitutional Balance Oxford: Hart Publishing (www.bloomsburyprofessi...
In this review, by concentrating on the general aim of Dworkin\u27s book, I hope to contribute to th...
In this Book Review, Professor Fleming examines Professor Tushnet\u27s arguments against judicial su...
I am very grateful to Ton Jörg for his discussion of my book Good education in an age of measurement...