Canadian criminal suspects have notably limited access to legal counsel upon arrest compared to suspects in the U.S. Additionally, prior research has shown significant misunderstanding of police warnings informing suspects of their rights upon arrest. This paper presents three studies on Canadians' comprehension of criminal suspects' rights upon arrest, with a focus on the right to counsel. Study 1 (N= 80) and Study 2 (N= 377) examined Canadian layperson's comprehension, knowledge, and perceptions of legal rights upon arrest. In turn, Study 3 (N= 78) investigated Canadian legal professionals' perceptions of laypersons' knowledge of those rights. Results from these three studies indicated there is substantial confusion about the right to cou...
The right to counsel under section 10(b) of the Charter is not triggered unless a suspect is arreste...
This thesis examines judicial approaches to cell-plant interrogations in Canada and the United State...
This article addresses the problem of determining when detention exists in the interrogation process...
Canadian criminal suspects have notably limited access to legal counsel upon arrest compared to susp...
Canadians who are detained by law enforcement officers are afforded the right to silence and the rig...
In the 2010 case of R. v. Sinclair, the Supreme Court of Canada explained how the Charter right to c...
This Article explores the Supreme Court of Canada\u27s use of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in ...
The delivery of interrogation rights to youth suspects and associated behaviours (e.g. seeking evide...
This thesis is a discussion about the inadequacy of the Canadian confessions rule in light of what m...
The delivery of legal rights in interrogations (N = 31) with youth suspects, and behaviours surround...
In most English-speaking Western countries, individuals facing a police interview are presented with...
Every person arrested for allegedly having committed a crime, has a constitutional right to be relea...
In an era of Charter protections, the common law rule excluding involuntary confessions remains a su...
Canada’s legal system recognizes that police interrogation procedures may contrib-ute to false confe...
What do Americans really know about the rights they hold as citizens? How confident are they in that...
The right to counsel under section 10(b) of the Charter is not triggered unless a suspect is arreste...
This thesis examines judicial approaches to cell-plant interrogations in Canada and the United State...
This article addresses the problem of determining when detention exists in the interrogation process...
Canadian criminal suspects have notably limited access to legal counsel upon arrest compared to susp...
Canadians who are detained by law enforcement officers are afforded the right to silence and the rig...
In the 2010 case of R. v. Sinclair, the Supreme Court of Canada explained how the Charter right to c...
This Article explores the Supreme Court of Canada\u27s use of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in ...
The delivery of interrogation rights to youth suspects and associated behaviours (e.g. seeking evide...
This thesis is a discussion about the inadequacy of the Canadian confessions rule in light of what m...
The delivery of legal rights in interrogations (N = 31) with youth suspects, and behaviours surround...
In most English-speaking Western countries, individuals facing a police interview are presented with...
Every person arrested for allegedly having committed a crime, has a constitutional right to be relea...
In an era of Charter protections, the common law rule excluding involuntary confessions remains a su...
Canada’s legal system recognizes that police interrogation procedures may contrib-ute to false confe...
What do Americans really know about the rights they hold as citizens? How confident are they in that...
The right to counsel under section 10(b) of the Charter is not triggered unless a suspect is arreste...
This thesis examines judicial approaches to cell-plant interrogations in Canada and the United State...
This article addresses the problem of determining when detention exists in the interrogation process...