The delivery of interrogation rights to youth suspects and associated behaviours (e.g. seeking evidence of comprehension) were examined in a sample of real-world interrogations (N = 31). Interrogation rights were delivered fully in approximately one-third of interrogations. Verification of comprehension was attempted rarely, and interrogators asked the youth to explain each right in their own words in less than 10 per cent of interrogations. Without improvement in the administration of interrogation rights, youth suspects remain vulnerable and unprotected in the criminal justice system
The Miranda v. Arizona (1966) decision was a pivotal case in the United States. It afforded rights t...
Despite growing concern regarding the problem of false confessions, including due to high profile DN...
In the United States, the juvenile justice system was created by the acknowledgement that adolescent...
The delivery of legal rights in interrogations (N = 31) with youth suspects, and behaviours surround...
Although youth in many Western countries have been afforded enhanced legal protections when facing p...
Canadians who are detained by law enforcement officers are afforded the right to silence and the rig...
The Supreme Court does not require any special procedural safeguards when police interrogate youths ...
The extent to which youths understand their interrogation rights was examined. High school students ...
This Article explores the Supreme Court of Canada\u27s use of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in ...
In order for young people to meaningfully participate in the criminal justice system they must poss...
While studies have explored adult suspects’ understanding of their legal rights, seldom are the expe...
The media can be accessed here: http://streaming.osu.edu/knowledgebank/CJRC/CJRC_Handbrake.mp4Crimin...
During the last 30 years, the way in which children give evidence in the criminal justice system in ...
In the 2010 case of R. v. Sinclair, the Supreme Court of Canada explained how the Charter right to c...
Canadian criminal suspects have notably limited access to legal counsel upon arrest compared to susp...
The Miranda v. Arizona (1966) decision was a pivotal case in the United States. It afforded rights t...
Despite growing concern regarding the problem of false confessions, including due to high profile DN...
In the United States, the juvenile justice system was created by the acknowledgement that adolescent...
The delivery of legal rights in interrogations (N = 31) with youth suspects, and behaviours surround...
Although youth in many Western countries have been afforded enhanced legal protections when facing p...
Canadians who are detained by law enforcement officers are afforded the right to silence and the rig...
The Supreme Court does not require any special procedural safeguards when police interrogate youths ...
The extent to which youths understand their interrogation rights was examined. High school students ...
This Article explores the Supreme Court of Canada\u27s use of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in ...
In order for young people to meaningfully participate in the criminal justice system they must poss...
While studies have explored adult suspects’ understanding of their legal rights, seldom are the expe...
The media can be accessed here: http://streaming.osu.edu/knowledgebank/CJRC/CJRC_Handbrake.mp4Crimin...
During the last 30 years, the way in which children give evidence in the criminal justice system in ...
In the 2010 case of R. v. Sinclair, the Supreme Court of Canada explained how the Charter right to c...
Canadian criminal suspects have notably limited access to legal counsel upon arrest compared to susp...
The Miranda v. Arizona (1966) decision was a pivotal case in the United States. It afforded rights t...
Despite growing concern regarding the problem of false confessions, including due to high profile DN...
In the United States, the juvenile justice system was created by the acknowledgement that adolescent...