In this case, the EU Court of Justice has ruled that the Rome III Regulation (EU Regulation No. 1259/2010) does not apply to a unilateral extrajudicial marriage dissolution (repudiation) pronounced in front of a religious court in Syria. By taking this decision, the Court no longer needed to verify whether Syrian law did grant spouses equal access to divorce on grounds of their sex (Article 10 Rome III). However, the Advocate-General has expressed himself on the interpretation of Article 10 Rome III. This article argues that the abstract approach advocated by the Advocate General in the assessment of Islamic repudiations is not the direction the EU should follow. In view of the still existing diversity in recognition policies within the EU,...
In the result of increased migration and the gradual formation of multicultural societies, the growt...
This article argues that Islamic authorities do not try to sustain a jurisdiction over Islamic divor...
The paper analyses judgment No. 16804/2020 delivered by the Court of Cassation (First Civil Session)...
In this case, the EU Court of Justice has ruled that the Rome III Regulation (EU Regulation No. 1259...
In this case, the EU Court of Justice has ruled that the Rome III Regulation (EU Regulation No. 1259...
In this case, the EU Court of Justice has ruled that the Rome III Regulation (EU Regulation No. 1259...
In this case, the EU Court of Justice has ruled that the Rome III Regulation (EU Regulation No. 1259...
This article reconsiders divorce laws in contemporary Muslim jurisdictions in light of the latest de...
This article reconsiders divorce laws in contemporary Muslim jurisdictions in light of the latest de...
In this article the development in france, germany and the netherlands of a recognition policy towar...
In this article the development in france, germany and the netherlands of a recognition policy towar...
In this article the development in france, germany and the netherlands of a recognition policy towar...
In this article the development in france, germany and the netherlands of a recognition policy towar...
In this article the development in france, germany and the netherlands of a recognition policy towar...
In this article the development in france, germany and the netherlands of a recognition policy towar...
In the result of increased migration and the gradual formation of multicultural societies, the growt...
This article argues that Islamic authorities do not try to sustain a jurisdiction over Islamic divor...
The paper analyses judgment No. 16804/2020 delivered by the Court of Cassation (First Civil Session)...
In this case, the EU Court of Justice has ruled that the Rome III Regulation (EU Regulation No. 1259...
In this case, the EU Court of Justice has ruled that the Rome III Regulation (EU Regulation No. 1259...
In this case, the EU Court of Justice has ruled that the Rome III Regulation (EU Regulation No. 1259...
In this case, the EU Court of Justice has ruled that the Rome III Regulation (EU Regulation No. 1259...
This article reconsiders divorce laws in contemporary Muslim jurisdictions in light of the latest de...
This article reconsiders divorce laws in contemporary Muslim jurisdictions in light of the latest de...
In this article the development in france, germany and the netherlands of a recognition policy towar...
In this article the development in france, germany and the netherlands of a recognition policy towar...
In this article the development in france, germany and the netherlands of a recognition policy towar...
In this article the development in france, germany and the netherlands of a recognition policy towar...
In this article the development in france, germany and the netherlands of a recognition policy towar...
In this article the development in france, germany and the netherlands of a recognition policy towar...
In the result of increased migration and the gradual formation of multicultural societies, the growt...
This article argues that Islamic authorities do not try to sustain a jurisdiction over Islamic divor...
The paper analyses judgment No. 16804/2020 delivered by the Court of Cassation (First Civil Session)...