We conduct a laboratory experiment with a constant-sum sender-receiver game and a sequential game of matching pennies with the same payoff structure to investigate the impact of individuals’ first- and second-order beliefs on truth-telling. While first-movers in matching pennies choose an action at random, senders in the sender-receiver game tell the truth more often than they lie. Since second-order beliefs are uncorrelated with actions in both games, excessive truth-telling is unlikely to be driven by guilt aversion or preferences for truth-telling that are based on second-order beliefs; preferences for truth-telling per-se, on the other hand, cannot be rejected.data source: no dat
We examine subjects’ behavior in sender–receiver games where there are gains from trade and alignmen...
Belief elicitation in game experiments may be problematic if it changes game play. We experimentally...
We report results from an experiment on a repeated sender/receiver game with twenty periods in which...
We conduct a laboratory experiment with a constant-sum sender-receiver game and a sequential game of...
Field experiments have shown that observing other people littering, stealing or lying can trigger ow...
Guilt averse individuals experience a utility loss if they believe they let someone down. In particu...
Field experiments have shown that observing other people littering, stealing or lying can trigger ow...
We examine subjects ’ behavior in sender-receiver games where there are gains from trade and alignme...
A recent experimental study of cai and wang [cai, h., wang, j., 2006. Overcommunication in strategic...
We compare three approaches to test for guilt aversion in two economic experiments. The first approa...
Belief elicitation in game experiments may be problematic if it changes game play. We experimentally...
A recent experimental study of Cai and Wang (2005) on strategic in-formation transmission reveals th...
This paper reports on a laboratory experiment which investigates the impact of institutions and inst...
Guilt averse individuals experience a utility loss if they believe they let someone down. For exampl...
We analyse two types of belief-dependent models of social prefer-ences: guilt aversion and reciproci...
We examine subjects’ behavior in sender–receiver games where there are gains from trade and alignmen...
Belief elicitation in game experiments may be problematic if it changes game play. We experimentally...
We report results from an experiment on a repeated sender/receiver game with twenty periods in which...
We conduct a laboratory experiment with a constant-sum sender-receiver game and a sequential game of...
Field experiments have shown that observing other people littering, stealing or lying can trigger ow...
Guilt averse individuals experience a utility loss if they believe they let someone down. In particu...
Field experiments have shown that observing other people littering, stealing or lying can trigger ow...
We examine subjects ’ behavior in sender-receiver games where there are gains from trade and alignme...
A recent experimental study of cai and wang [cai, h., wang, j., 2006. Overcommunication in strategic...
We compare three approaches to test for guilt aversion in two economic experiments. The first approa...
Belief elicitation in game experiments may be problematic if it changes game play. We experimentally...
A recent experimental study of Cai and Wang (2005) on strategic in-formation transmission reveals th...
This paper reports on a laboratory experiment which investigates the impact of institutions and inst...
Guilt averse individuals experience a utility loss if they believe they let someone down. For exampl...
We analyse two types of belief-dependent models of social prefer-ences: guilt aversion and reciproci...
We examine subjects’ behavior in sender–receiver games where there are gains from trade and alignmen...
Belief elicitation in game experiments may be problematic if it changes game play. We experimentally...
We report results from an experiment on a repeated sender/receiver game with twenty periods in which...