Add to ORKGAn investigation of Supreme Court Confirmation hearings reveals many queries posed to nominees reference specific court cases, especially recent decisions, and with questioning often divided along partisan lines. These findings indicate that the hearings are more substantive than is commonly assumed
Over the weekend, President Trump nominated Judge Amy Coney Barrett to fill the Supreme Court seat l...
As Senator Arlen Specter once explained, the Supreme Court confirmation process is a “matter of grea...
In testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, I argued (and still believe) that Judge Robert B...
An investigation of Supreme Court Confirmation hearings reveals many queries posed to nominees refer...
The interpretive or judicial philosophies of Supreme Court Justices can be thought of as “packages o...
ABSTRACT In 1816, the Senate created the Committee on the Judiciary to assist in its task of providi...
This article uses an original database of confirmation hearing dialogue to examine how the Senate Ju...
This paper examines the questions asked and answers given by every Supreme Court nominee who has app...
This article appearing at the SCOTUSblog on March 25, 2016, discusses the role of the Senate Judicia...
Senate confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominees have in recent years grown increasingly cont...
While the U.S. Senate is now unable to make use of the filibuster to delay judicial nominees to fede...
In 1995, a law professor at the University of Chicago Law School dubbed the Supreme Court confirmati...
The confirmation process for Supreme Court justices is examined as a form of indirect constitutional...
Until recently legal scholars have traditionally not been much involved in the process of confirming...
University of Minnesota Ph.D. dissertation. August 2014. Major: Political Science. Advisor: Timothy ...
Over the weekend, President Trump nominated Judge Amy Coney Barrett to fill the Supreme Court seat l...
As Senator Arlen Specter once explained, the Supreme Court confirmation process is a “matter of grea...
In testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, I argued (and still believe) that Judge Robert B...
An investigation of Supreme Court Confirmation hearings reveals many queries posed to nominees refer...
The interpretive or judicial philosophies of Supreme Court Justices can be thought of as “packages o...
ABSTRACT In 1816, the Senate created the Committee on the Judiciary to assist in its task of providi...
This article uses an original database of confirmation hearing dialogue to examine how the Senate Ju...
This paper examines the questions asked and answers given by every Supreme Court nominee who has app...
This article appearing at the SCOTUSblog on March 25, 2016, discusses the role of the Senate Judicia...
Senate confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominees have in recent years grown increasingly cont...
While the U.S. Senate is now unable to make use of the filibuster to delay judicial nominees to fede...
In 1995, a law professor at the University of Chicago Law School dubbed the Supreme Court confirmati...
The confirmation process for Supreme Court justices is examined as a form of indirect constitutional...
Until recently legal scholars have traditionally not been much involved in the process of confirming...
University of Minnesota Ph.D. dissertation. August 2014. Major: Political Science. Advisor: Timothy ...
Over the weekend, President Trump nominated Judge Amy Coney Barrett to fill the Supreme Court seat l...
As Senator Arlen Specter once explained, the Supreme Court confirmation process is a “matter of grea...
In testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, I argued (and still believe) that Judge Robert B...