Add to ORKGAn investigation of Supreme Court Confirmation hearings reveals many queries posed to nominees reference specific court cases, especially recent decisions, and with questioning often divided along partisan lines. These findings indicate that the hearings are more substantive than is commonly assumed
In the midst of the contentious confirmation hearings of Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh...
The subject of this lecture is the confirmation mess —a topic on which I have written before. In th...
Abstract: The divisiveness of the lower federal court confirmation process has been the focus of ext...
An investigation of Supreme Court Confirmation hearings reveals many queries posed to nominees refer...
The interpretive or judicial philosophies of Supreme Court Justices can be thought of as “packages o...
While the U.S. Senate is now unable to make use of the filibuster to delay judicial nominees to fede...
Until recently legal scholars have traditionally not been much involved in the process of confirming...
This article in The Conversation on March 21, 2016 and moves beyond the conventional wisdom espoused...
Supreme Court confirmation hearings provide a rare opportunity for the American people to hear what ...
ABSTRACT In 1816, the Senate created the Committee on the Judiciary to assist in its task of providi...
At Justice Neil Gorsuch’s confirmation hearing, then-Judge Gorsuch repeatedly insisted that judging ...
The authors argue that Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings serve as a democratic forum for the discu...
Senate confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominees have in recent years grown increasingly cont...
This article appearing at the SCOTUSblog on March 25, 2016, discusses the role of the Senate Judicia...
The Supreme Court confirmation process is an essential aspect of ensuring the democratic accountabil...
In the midst of the contentious confirmation hearings of Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh...
The subject of this lecture is the confirmation mess —a topic on which I have written before. In th...
Abstract: The divisiveness of the lower federal court confirmation process has been the focus of ext...
An investigation of Supreme Court Confirmation hearings reveals many queries posed to nominees refer...
The interpretive or judicial philosophies of Supreme Court Justices can be thought of as “packages o...
While the U.S. Senate is now unable to make use of the filibuster to delay judicial nominees to fede...
Until recently legal scholars have traditionally not been much involved in the process of confirming...
This article in The Conversation on March 21, 2016 and moves beyond the conventional wisdom espoused...
Supreme Court confirmation hearings provide a rare opportunity for the American people to hear what ...
ABSTRACT In 1816, the Senate created the Committee on the Judiciary to assist in its task of providi...
At Justice Neil Gorsuch’s confirmation hearing, then-Judge Gorsuch repeatedly insisted that judging ...
The authors argue that Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings serve as a democratic forum for the discu...
Senate confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominees have in recent years grown increasingly cont...
This article appearing at the SCOTUSblog on March 25, 2016, discusses the role of the Senate Judicia...
The Supreme Court confirmation process is an essential aspect of ensuring the democratic accountabil...
In the midst of the contentious confirmation hearings of Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh...
The subject of this lecture is the confirmation mess —a topic on which I have written before. In th...
Abstract: The divisiveness of the lower federal court confirmation process has been the focus of ext...