Responsibility for damage caused by the misconduct of local government officers and employees has long been a concern of the law and of legal observers. According to most accounts, Anglo-American law historically has responded with two diverse rules: immunity for the governments, and liability for the official; both, however, are only points of departure. Although both rules are well established, each carries its own qualifications and the precise relationship between the two is a matter of some controversy
Whether state and local governments can be sued for damages is a question that cuts across subject-a...
Qualified immunity protects officials from damages for constitutional violations unless they have vi...
A public office is a public trust.The incumbent has a property right in it, but the office is confer...
Responsibility for damage caused by the misconduct of local government officers and employees has lo...
The common law rule of governmental immunity made governments immune from suit and held public offic...
The initial question in evaluating the ability of a municipal corporation to control the affairs of ...
One of the most significant and potentially objectionable powers exercised by any level of governmen...
Georgia local government law not only encompasses a forbidding substantive expanse; it occupies a do...
For the last sixty years, workers\u27 compensation has constituted a distinct subject of administrat...
The law under which government officials operate permits them to inflict injury on others, under pre...
The State\u27s immunity from liability for the torts of its officers and employees claims legendary ...
Under Monell v. Department of Social Services, local governments are not vicariously liable for cons...
The legislative and judicial dismantling of sovereign immunity is among the more significant and cel...
Whether it be contact between local government officers themselves, or between officer and citizen, ...
The current constitutional torts system under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 affords little relief to victims of g...
Whether state and local governments can be sued for damages is a question that cuts across subject-a...
Qualified immunity protects officials from damages for constitutional violations unless they have vi...
A public office is a public trust.The incumbent has a property right in it, but the office is confer...
Responsibility for damage caused by the misconduct of local government officers and employees has lo...
The common law rule of governmental immunity made governments immune from suit and held public offic...
The initial question in evaluating the ability of a municipal corporation to control the affairs of ...
One of the most significant and potentially objectionable powers exercised by any level of governmen...
Georgia local government law not only encompasses a forbidding substantive expanse; it occupies a do...
For the last sixty years, workers\u27 compensation has constituted a distinct subject of administrat...
The law under which government officials operate permits them to inflict injury on others, under pre...
The State\u27s immunity from liability for the torts of its officers and employees claims legendary ...
Under Monell v. Department of Social Services, local governments are not vicariously liable for cons...
The legislative and judicial dismantling of sovereign immunity is among the more significant and cel...
Whether it be contact between local government officers themselves, or between officer and citizen, ...
The current constitutional torts system under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 affords little relief to victims of g...
Whether state and local governments can be sued for damages is a question that cuts across subject-a...
Qualified immunity protects officials from damages for constitutional violations unless they have vi...
A public office is a public trust.The incumbent has a property right in it, but the office is confer...