Responsibility for damage caused by the misconduct of local government officers and employees has long been a concern of the law and of legal observers. According to most accounts, Anglo-American law historically has responded with two diverse rules: immunity for the governments, and liability for the official; both, however, are only points of departure. Although both rules are well established, each carries its own qualifications and the precise relationship between the two is a matter of some controversy
Recent developments suggest that even without congressional action municipalities and other subdivis...
Probably no function of a municipal corporation is more “governmental in character than the care of...
For the last sixty years, workers\u27 compensation has constituted a distinct subject of administrat...
Responsibility for damage caused by the misconduct of local government officers and employees has lo...
The common law rule of governmental immunity made governments immune from suit and held public offic...
The law under which government officials operate permits them to inflict injury on others, under pre...
Georgia local government law not only encompasses a forbidding substantive expanse; it occupies a do...
The legislative and judicial dismantling of sovereign immunity is among the more significant and cel...
The State\u27s immunity from liability for the torts of its officers and employees claims legendary ...
Under the prevailing doctrine in this country neither the state nor the federal government is liable...
Because each and every tort occurs somewhere in a county and frequently within the city limits, ...
It is both historical and undeniable that local government law does not expose all local government...
Under Monell v. Department of Social Services, local governments are not vicariously liable for cons...
The initial question in evaluating the ability of a municipal corporation to control the affairs of ...
In addition to the historical doctrines justifying government irresponsibility, already discussed, i...
Recent developments suggest that even without congressional action municipalities and other subdivis...
Probably no function of a municipal corporation is more “governmental in character than the care of...
For the last sixty years, workers\u27 compensation has constituted a distinct subject of administrat...
Responsibility for damage caused by the misconduct of local government officers and employees has lo...
The common law rule of governmental immunity made governments immune from suit and held public offic...
The law under which government officials operate permits them to inflict injury on others, under pre...
Georgia local government law not only encompasses a forbidding substantive expanse; it occupies a do...
The legislative and judicial dismantling of sovereign immunity is among the more significant and cel...
The State\u27s immunity from liability for the torts of its officers and employees claims legendary ...
Under the prevailing doctrine in this country neither the state nor the federal government is liable...
Because each and every tort occurs somewhere in a county and frequently within the city limits, ...
It is both historical and undeniable that local government law does not expose all local government...
Under Monell v. Department of Social Services, local governments are not vicariously liable for cons...
The initial question in evaluating the ability of a municipal corporation to control the affairs of ...
In addition to the historical doctrines justifying government irresponsibility, already discussed, i...
Recent developments suggest that even without congressional action municipalities and other subdivis...
Probably no function of a municipal corporation is more “governmental in character than the care of...
For the last sixty years, workers\u27 compensation has constituted a distinct subject of administrat...