Add to ORKGAssistant Professor Erica Hashimoto outlines her research on why felony defendants should continue to have the constitutional right to represent themselves
Litigation in person is a widespread phenomenon in common law jurisdictions. A right to litigate in ...
Recent historical scholarship has demonstrated that the practice of self-representation at common la...
I. Introduction II. The Faretta Decision III. Procedural Issues Affecting the Right to a Pro Se Defe...
Assistant Professor Erica Hashimoto outlines her research on why felony defendants should continue t...
Assistant Professor Erica Hashimoto outlines her research on why felony defendants should continue t...
Why would a criminal defendant waive the right to counsel and proceed pro se? Conventional wisdom as...
A fundamental facet of our criminal legal system is that every “litigant” (defendant) is entitled to...
Rabeea Assy’s Injustice in Person: The Right of Self-Representation (Oxford University Press) offers...
The general opinion of those choosing to defend themselves in legal proceedings is that they are men...
Though all U.S. courts recognize the right to self-representation as a result of the Supreme Court\u...
Sixteenth and early seventeenth century England did not recognize the right to counsel in criminal c...
In Faretta v. California, the United States Supreme Court held that a defendant in a criminal trial...
This Article takes a strategic look at potential state court responses to Indiana v. Edwards. After ...
The impact of civil legal entanglement on individuals and communities in matters involving essential...
In 2008, the Supreme Court held that the Sixth Amendment permits a trial court to impose a higher co...
Litigation in person is a widespread phenomenon in common law jurisdictions. A right to litigate in ...
Recent historical scholarship has demonstrated that the practice of self-representation at common la...
I. Introduction II. The Faretta Decision III. Procedural Issues Affecting the Right to a Pro Se Defe...
Assistant Professor Erica Hashimoto outlines her research on why felony defendants should continue t...
Assistant Professor Erica Hashimoto outlines her research on why felony defendants should continue t...
Why would a criminal defendant waive the right to counsel and proceed pro se? Conventional wisdom as...
A fundamental facet of our criminal legal system is that every “litigant” (defendant) is entitled to...
Rabeea Assy’s Injustice in Person: The Right of Self-Representation (Oxford University Press) offers...
The general opinion of those choosing to defend themselves in legal proceedings is that they are men...
Though all U.S. courts recognize the right to self-representation as a result of the Supreme Court\u...
Sixteenth and early seventeenth century England did not recognize the right to counsel in criminal c...
In Faretta v. California, the United States Supreme Court held that a defendant in a criminal trial...
This Article takes a strategic look at potential state court responses to Indiana v. Edwards. After ...
The impact of civil legal entanglement on individuals and communities in matters involving essential...
In 2008, the Supreme Court held that the Sixth Amendment permits a trial court to impose a higher co...
Litigation in person is a widespread phenomenon in common law jurisdictions. A right to litigate in ...
Recent historical scholarship has demonstrated that the practice of self-representation at common la...
I. Introduction II. The Faretta Decision III. Procedural Issues Affecting the Right to a Pro Se Defe...