A fundamental facet of our criminal legal system is that every “litigant” (defendant) is entitled to be represented by an attorney.1 What is equally fundamental, though less frequently invoked in the criminal context, is the right of an individual to represent him- or herself.2 Self-representation is not merely the default consequence of an inability to afford an attorney, it is an affirmative right. In Faretta v. California, a criminal case, the court held that forcing the defendant against his will to accept a state-appointed public defender rather than allowing him to conduct his own defense violated rights “necessarily implied” in the Sixth Amendment and was “contrary to his basic right to defend himself if he truly wants to.”
The question involved here is the right of a person, not an attorney, to bring action or defend in...
The impact of civil legal entanglement on individuals and communities in matters involving essential...
In Faretta v. California, the Supreme Court exalted the value of autonomy – the criminal defendant’s...
In Faretta v. California, the United States Supreme Court held that a defendant in a criminal trial...
Sixteenth and early seventeenth century England did not recognize the right to counsel in criminal c...
Assistant Professor Erica Hashimoto outlines her research on why felony defendants should continue t...
Assistant Professor Erica Hashimoto outlines her research on why felony defendants should continue t...
Though all U.S. courts recognize the right to self-representation as a result of the Supreme Court\u...
The United States Constitution makes provision for criminal defendants to be represented by counsel....
Why would a criminal defendant waive the right to counsel and proceed pro se? Conventional wisdom as...
I. Introduction II. The Faretta Decision III. Procedural Issues Affecting the Right to a Pro Se Defe...
Litigation in person is a widespread phenomenon in common law jurisdictions. A right to litigate in ...
Rabeea Assy’s Injustice in Person: The Right of Self-Representation (Oxford University Press) offers...
The case of Pennsylvania v Cosby has brought into sharp relief the question of what criteria apply i...
As we have seen over the last two decades, the number of lawsuits in America is rising significantly...
The question involved here is the right of a person, not an attorney, to bring action or defend in...
The impact of civil legal entanglement on individuals and communities in matters involving essential...
In Faretta v. California, the Supreme Court exalted the value of autonomy – the criminal defendant’s...
In Faretta v. California, the United States Supreme Court held that a defendant in a criminal trial...
Sixteenth and early seventeenth century England did not recognize the right to counsel in criminal c...
Assistant Professor Erica Hashimoto outlines her research on why felony defendants should continue t...
Assistant Professor Erica Hashimoto outlines her research on why felony defendants should continue t...
Though all U.S. courts recognize the right to self-representation as a result of the Supreme Court\u...
The United States Constitution makes provision for criminal defendants to be represented by counsel....
Why would a criminal defendant waive the right to counsel and proceed pro se? Conventional wisdom as...
I. Introduction II. The Faretta Decision III. Procedural Issues Affecting the Right to a Pro Se Defe...
Litigation in person is a widespread phenomenon in common law jurisdictions. A right to litigate in ...
Rabeea Assy’s Injustice in Person: The Right of Self-Representation (Oxford University Press) offers...
The case of Pennsylvania v Cosby has brought into sharp relief the question of what criteria apply i...
As we have seen over the last two decades, the number of lawsuits in America is rising significantly...
The question involved here is the right of a person, not an attorney, to bring action or defend in...
The impact of civil legal entanglement on individuals and communities in matters involving essential...
In Faretta v. California, the Supreme Court exalted the value of autonomy – the criminal defendant’s...