Where an irrevocable trust uses terms to distinguish between different classes of beneficiary, the court must look at the usage of those terms within the instrument to determine whether a beneficiary is entitled to an accounting of the trust. Additionally, NRS 165.180 only stands for the proposition that NRS Chapter 165 does not contain an exhaustive list of the district court’s power over trusts. NRS 165.180 does not stand as an independent grant of powers not otherwise listed in the chapter
The Court determined that application of NRS § 116.3116(8) which states that “[a] judgment or decree...
Pursuant to NRAP 5, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada certified five que...
The Rights of Creditors of Beneficiaries under the Uniform Trust Code: An Examination of the Comprom...
In an opinion authored by Justice Pickering, following both the NRS and California law, the Court af...
The Nevada Supreme Court adopted the Restatement (Second) of Trusts SS 338 (Am. Law Inst. 1959). It ...
The Court determined that (1) NRS 155.190(1)(h) only grants the Court appellate jurisdiction over th...
NRS § 163.556 does not permit a court to disregard trustees\u27 objections and appoint half of a who...
The Court affirmed the district court’s order granting the motion to dismiss and determined that dee...
The Court determined that (1) family courts have subject matter jurisdiction in divorce proceedings ...
A second beneficiary is entitled to a property in a trust created by decedent and her former spouse,...
The Court determined that a no-contest clause in a trust does not foreclose a beneficiary’s interest...
Distribution of estate funds under NRS Chapter 159 or a court’s distribution order requires a distri...
The Court determined that Nevada law does not recognize implied restrictive covenants based on a com...
The Court determined that (1) previous case law and the NRS require an HOA that is seeking to forecl...
The Court concluded that the promissory note, which had security interest by both a deed of trust of...
The Court determined that application of NRS § 116.3116(8) which states that “[a] judgment or decree...
Pursuant to NRAP 5, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada certified five que...
The Rights of Creditors of Beneficiaries under the Uniform Trust Code: An Examination of the Comprom...
In an opinion authored by Justice Pickering, following both the NRS and California law, the Court af...
The Nevada Supreme Court adopted the Restatement (Second) of Trusts SS 338 (Am. Law Inst. 1959). It ...
The Court determined that (1) NRS 155.190(1)(h) only grants the Court appellate jurisdiction over th...
NRS § 163.556 does not permit a court to disregard trustees\u27 objections and appoint half of a who...
The Court affirmed the district court’s order granting the motion to dismiss and determined that dee...
The Court determined that (1) family courts have subject matter jurisdiction in divorce proceedings ...
A second beneficiary is entitled to a property in a trust created by decedent and her former spouse,...
The Court determined that a no-contest clause in a trust does not foreclose a beneficiary’s interest...
Distribution of estate funds under NRS Chapter 159 or a court’s distribution order requires a distri...
The Court determined that Nevada law does not recognize implied restrictive covenants based on a com...
The Court determined that (1) previous case law and the NRS require an HOA that is seeking to forecl...
The Court concluded that the promissory note, which had security interest by both a deed of trust of...
The Court determined that application of NRS § 116.3116(8) which states that “[a] judgment or decree...
Pursuant to NRAP 5, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada certified five que...
The Rights of Creditors of Beneficiaries under the Uniform Trust Code: An Examination of the Comprom...