Add to ORKGPlaintiff began his action for breach of contract in a state court of Indiana. On defendant\u27s timely petition the suit was removed to the United States District Court. Plaintiff then amended his pleadings by filing particulars of his claim which reduced the amount recoverable below the jurisdictional amount. On a writ of certiorari it was held that the jurisdiction of the district court was not defeated by the amendment reducing the amount claimed to below the jurisdictional amount. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co., 303 U.S. 283, 58 S. Ct. 586 (1938)
Plaintiff, a Michigan trucking company subject to the LMRA, brought suit in a Michigan court agains...
The ubiquitous and somewhat careless use of the term “jurisdictional” by courts has spawned confusio...
The ability of a federal court hearing a federal cause of action to assert jurisdiction over a nonre...
Respondent sued petitioner, a Florida corporation, the Indiana Lumbermen\u27s Mutual Insurance Compa...
Two suits for personal injuries, in each of which a claim for $5,000 was made, were removed to the f...
Plaintiff brought an action for damages in a state court Defendant filed pleas to the declaration, a...
Hoping to keep federal court dockets free of petty claims and thereby to reduce the delay in bringin...
The plaintiffs, local officers of a union, sued to enjoin the national officers of the union from in...
In 1956 plaintiff corporation brought a private antitrust action against various persons and corpora...
Plaintiff, a manufacturer\u27s agent, sued his employer in the Municipal Court, Civil Division, Wash...
Plaintiff sued to recover indebtedness of $7000, to foreclose a chattel mortgage, and to enjoin a lo...
One hates to seem ungrateful. Judges and scholars frequently call for Congress to fix problems in th...
Late in 1990, Congress passed a statute that confers on the district courts “supplemental jurisdicti...
Plaintiff sued the United States Government for breach of its contract for construction of a water s...
A recent congressional amendment of federal district court jurisdictional requirements for both dive...
Plaintiff, a Michigan trucking company subject to the LMRA, brought suit in a Michigan court agains...
The ubiquitous and somewhat careless use of the term “jurisdictional” by courts has spawned confusio...
The ability of a federal court hearing a federal cause of action to assert jurisdiction over a nonre...
Respondent sued petitioner, a Florida corporation, the Indiana Lumbermen\u27s Mutual Insurance Compa...
Two suits for personal injuries, in each of which a claim for $5,000 was made, were removed to the f...
Plaintiff brought an action for damages in a state court Defendant filed pleas to the declaration, a...
Hoping to keep federal court dockets free of petty claims and thereby to reduce the delay in bringin...
The plaintiffs, local officers of a union, sued to enjoin the national officers of the union from in...
In 1956 plaintiff corporation brought a private antitrust action against various persons and corpora...
Plaintiff, a manufacturer\u27s agent, sued his employer in the Municipal Court, Civil Division, Wash...
Plaintiff sued to recover indebtedness of $7000, to foreclose a chattel mortgage, and to enjoin a lo...
One hates to seem ungrateful. Judges and scholars frequently call for Congress to fix problems in th...
Late in 1990, Congress passed a statute that confers on the district courts “supplemental jurisdicti...
Plaintiff sued the United States Government for breach of its contract for construction of a water s...
A recent congressional amendment of federal district court jurisdictional requirements for both dive...
Plaintiff, a Michigan trucking company subject to the LMRA, brought suit in a Michigan court agains...
The ubiquitous and somewhat careless use of the term “jurisdictional” by courts has spawned confusio...
The ability of a federal court hearing a federal cause of action to assert jurisdiction over a nonre...