Plaintiff brought an action for damages in a state court Defendant filed pleas to the declaration, and also filed a counterclaim arising out of the same cause of action. On this date defendant also filed a motion with the Federal District Court asking removal of the case based solely upon his counterclaim. On plaintiff\u27s motion, held, case remanded to the state court. Defendant has no right under the United States Judicial Code to have a case removed from the state court to the federal court when his motion is based upon his own counterclaim. Collins v. Faucett, (D.C. Fla. 1949) 87 F. Supp. 254
Two suits for personal injuries, in each of which a claim for $5,000 was made, were removed to the f...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.When a plaintiff sues in state court relying so...
This Article proceeds as follows: Part I of the Article begins by laying the statutory and constitut...
Plaintiff began his action for breach of contract in a state court of Indiana. On defendant\u27s tim...
Respondent sued petitioner, a Florida corporation, the Indiana Lumbermen\u27s Mutual Insurance Compa...
The respondent suffered a loss by fire, and being uncertain as to which party was liable to compensa...
Plaintiff brought suit in the Municipal Court of Cleveland based on an automobile collision which oc...
This article first discusses the different approaches that courts have used in determining district ...
Removal jurisdiction is the authority by which a cause of action or claim can be transferred, before...
With one exception the cases decided in the federal courts under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedur...
Federal jurisdiction based on preemption removal should extend to federal laws which meet the requir...
Respondent sued petitioner, a Florida corporation, the Indiana Lumbermen\u27s Mutual Insurance Compa...
Plaintiff sued to recover indebtedness of $7000, to foreclose a chattel mortgage, and to enjoin a lo...
This Note concludes that the Sixth Circuit was half right: when a civil action names both state and ...
This Article provides a preview of Carnegie-Mellon University v. Honorable Maurice B. Cohill, Jr., a...
Two suits for personal injuries, in each of which a claim for $5,000 was made, were removed to the f...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.When a plaintiff sues in state court relying so...
This Article proceeds as follows: Part I of the Article begins by laying the statutory and constitut...
Plaintiff began his action for breach of contract in a state court of Indiana. On defendant\u27s tim...
Respondent sued petitioner, a Florida corporation, the Indiana Lumbermen\u27s Mutual Insurance Compa...
The respondent suffered a loss by fire, and being uncertain as to which party was liable to compensa...
Plaintiff brought suit in the Municipal Court of Cleveland based on an automobile collision which oc...
This article first discusses the different approaches that courts have used in determining district ...
Removal jurisdiction is the authority by which a cause of action or claim can be transferred, before...
With one exception the cases decided in the federal courts under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedur...
Federal jurisdiction based on preemption removal should extend to federal laws which meet the requir...
Respondent sued petitioner, a Florida corporation, the Indiana Lumbermen\u27s Mutual Insurance Compa...
Plaintiff sued to recover indebtedness of $7000, to foreclose a chattel mortgage, and to enjoin a lo...
This Note concludes that the Sixth Circuit was half right: when a civil action names both state and ...
This Article provides a preview of Carnegie-Mellon University v. Honorable Maurice B. Cohill, Jr., a...
Two suits for personal injuries, in each of which a claim for $5,000 was made, were removed to the f...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.When a plaintiff sues in state court relying so...
This Article proceeds as follows: Part I of the Article begins by laying the statutory and constitut...