Comparison over the fitting period.

Comparison of GRS predictions.

Benjamin W. Domingue (592124)
Daniel W. Belsky (592125)
Kathleen Mullan Harris (366948)
Andrew Smolen (592126)
Matthew B. McQueen (178154)
Jason D. Boardman (592127)

July 2014

Panel A compares the predictive performance of GRS-E in both white and black samples of Add Healt...

Classification performance comparison.

Stefan P. Koch (709024)
Claudia Hägele (709025)
John-Dylan Haynes (349026)
Andreas Heinz (159095)
Florian Schlagenhauf (303974)
Philipp Sterzer (191281)

March 2015

The top and bottom panels depict percent correct classification rates (accuracies) obtained from ...

Comparison of province-level prediction accuracy between full-data and real-time predictions, by prediction horizon.

Nicholas G. Reich (167708)
Stephen A. Lauer (716220)
Krzysztof Sakrejda (2837681)
Sopon Iamsirithaworn (260152)
Soawapak Hinjoy (332639)
Paphanij Suangtho (2837678)
Suthanun Suthachana (2837675)
Hannah E. Clapham (2157634)
Henrik Salje (589157)
Derek A. T. Cummings (116201)
Justin Lessler (116180)

June 2016

These calculations assume that both the full-data and real-time multi-step predictions began at t...

Forecast comparison over the testing period (2021).

Luis A. Barboza (6705467)
Shu-Wei Chou-Chen (14425303)
Paola Vásquez (14425306)
Yury E. García (12568899)
Juan G. Calvo (14425309)
Hugo G. Hidalgo (6892922)
Fabio Sanchez (14425312)

January 2023

Upper six panels: best cantons according to NIS metric. Lower three panels: worst cantons according ...

Observed climate covariates and forecast values at two specific cantons: Alajuela (left panels) and Quepos (right panels).

Luis A. Barboza (6705467)
Shu-Wei Chou-Chen (14425303)
Paola Vásquez (14425306)
Yury E. García (12568899)
Juan G. Calvo (14425309)
Hugo G. Hidalgo (6892922)
Fabio Sanchez (14425312)

January 2023

Black line: observed climate covariates, red line: forecast values, and red shaded areas: 95% confid...

Comparison between different baseline correction methods.

Tingting Cai (1390768)
Huilin Zhu (2437600)
Jie Xu (34477)
Shijing Wu (3753154)
Xinge Li (3753151)
Sailing He (1423405)

February 2017

Good (a) and bad (b) trial samples after preprocessing of fNIRS data. Solid cyan curves: the time...

Comparison of various prediction methods in terms of the area under the ROC curve (AUC).

Bernd Lütkenhöner (486490)
Türker Basel (486491)

November 2013

Comparison of various prediction methods in terms of the area under the ROC curve (AUC).</p

Comparison of fitted model results on different hierarchical levels.

Lennart Schüler (11292303)
Justin M. Calabrese (8032763)
Sabine Attinger (360897)

August 2021

Comparisons of parametrized model runs on a higher hierarchical level with the aggregated case numbe...

The comparison between raw data and sinusoidal model fit results for north district.

Jingyang Zou (391802)
Hua Yang (120668)
Hengjian Cui (391803)
Yuelong Shu (132243)
Peipei Xu (391804)
Cuiling Xu (223774)
Tao Chen (75911)

March 2013

The black line is the time series of raw data, while the red line is the sinusoidal fitting curve...

The comparison between raw data and sinusoidal model fit results for the south1 district.

Jingyang Zou (391802)
Hua Yang (120668)
Hengjian Cui (391803)
Yuelong Shu (132243)
Peipei Xu (391804)
Cuiling Xu (223774)
Tao Chen (75911)

March 2013

The black line is the time series of raw data, while the red line is the sinusoidal fitting curve...

Comparison of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for prediction of mortality among different scoring systems in training cohort (panel A, at 12-month; panel B, at 36-month), and in validation cohort (panel C, at 12-month; panel D, at 36-month).

Sha Huang (459101)
Gui-Qian Huang (752018)
Gui-Qi Zhu (752019)
Wen-Yue Liu (138454)
Jie You (42305)
Ke-Qing Shi (138450)
Xiao-Bo Wang (3228759)
Han-Yang Che (752020)
Guo-Liang Chen (652632)
Jian-Feng Fang (752021)
Yi Zhou (2723)
Meng-Tao Zhou (5663959)
Yong-Ping Chen (138457)
Martin Braddock (752022)
Ming-Hua Zheng (138448)

June 2015

P values: (1) Panel A: a vs b = 0.0004; a vs c = 0.0004; a vs d < 0.0001; a vs e < 0.0001; (2) Pa...

Comparisons of mean ADI and SVI scores among tracts with good and poor index agreement.

Kimberly A. Rollings (6735737)
Grace A. Noppert (5697851)
Jennifer J. Griggs (11613941)
Robert A. Melendez (17102650)
Philippa J. Clarke (10663551)

October 2023

Abbreviations: ADI, area deprivation index; SVI, social vulnerability index. a = The image illustrat...

Comparison of the country ranking between our metrics and the MR.

Matthieu Cristelli (149874)
Andrea Gabrielli (302210)
Andrea Tacchella (302213)
Guido Caldarelli (149870)
Luciano Pietronero (302211)

August 2013

In panel a we compare the two rankings while in panel b and c we respectivel...

Comparison of submitted forecast and final CDC-reported % of clinic visits that were for ILI for the continental USA and three selected regions.

Michal Ben-Nun (413104)
Pete Riley (413103)
James Turtle (6728930)
David P. Bacon (413109)
Steven Riley (31524)

May 2019

Final season CDC reported (black line), reported during the season (black circles) and predicted %IL...

Comparison of different metrics used for modeling the regional interactions.

Luping Zhou (347998)
Yaping Wang (289641)
Yang Li (7082)
Pew-Thian Yap (305644)
Dinggang Shen (204274)

February 2013

The classification accuracy is plotted over different number of training samples. For a given num...

Comparison of GRS predictions.

Benjamin W. Domingue (592124)
Daniel W. Belsky (592125)
Kathleen Mullan Harris (366948)
Andrew Smolen (592126)
Matthew B. McQueen (178154)
Jason D. Boardman (592127)

July 2014

Panel A compares the predictive performance of GRS-E in both white and black samples of Add Healt...

Classification performance comparison.

Stefan P. Koch (709024)
Claudia Hägele (709025)
John-Dylan Haynes (349026)
Andreas Heinz (159095)
Florian Schlagenhauf (303974)
Philipp Sterzer (191281)

March 2015

The top and bottom panels depict percent correct classification rates (accuracies) obtained from ...

Comparison of province-level prediction accuracy between full-data and real-time predictions, by prediction horizon.

Nicholas G. Reich (167708)
Stephen A. Lauer (716220)
Krzysztof Sakrejda (2837681)
Sopon Iamsirithaworn (260152)
Soawapak Hinjoy (332639)
Paphanij Suangtho (2837678)
Suthanun Suthachana (2837675)
Hannah E. Clapham (2157634)
Henrik Salje (589157)
Derek A. T. Cummings (116201)
Justin Lessler (116180)

June 2016

These calculations assume that both the full-data and real-time multi-step predictions began at t...

Forecast comparison over the testing period (2021).

Luis A. Barboza (6705467)
Shu-Wei Chou-Chen (14425303)
Paola Vásquez (14425306)
Yury E. García (12568899)
Juan G. Calvo (14425309)
Hugo G. Hidalgo (6892922)
Fabio Sanchez (14425312)

January 2023

Upper six panels: best cantons according to NIS metric. Lower three panels: worst cantons according ...

Observed climate covariates and forecast values at two specific cantons: Alajuela (left panels) and Quepos (right panels).

Luis A. Barboza (6705467)
Shu-Wei Chou-Chen (14425303)
Paola Vásquez (14425306)
Yury E. García (12568899)
Juan G. Calvo (14425309)
Hugo G. Hidalgo (6892922)
Fabio Sanchez (14425312)

January 2023

Black line: observed climate covariates, red line: forecast values, and red shaded areas: 95% confid...

Comparison between different baseline correction methods.

Tingting Cai (1390768)
Huilin Zhu (2437600)
Jie Xu (34477)
Shijing Wu (3753154)
Xinge Li (3753151)
Sailing He (1423405)

February 2017

Good (a) and bad (b) trial samples after preprocessing of fNIRS data. Solid cyan curves: the time...

Comparison of various prediction methods in terms of the area under the ROC curve (AUC).

Bernd Lütkenhöner (486490)
Türker Basel (486491)

November 2013

Comparison of various prediction methods in terms of the area under the ROC curve (AUC).</p

Comparison of fitted model results on different hierarchical levels.

Lennart Schüler (11292303)
Justin M. Calabrese (8032763)
Sabine Attinger (360897)

August 2021

Comparisons of parametrized model runs on a higher hierarchical level with the aggregated case numbe...

The comparison between raw data and sinusoidal model fit results for north district.

Jingyang Zou (391802)
Hua Yang (120668)
Hengjian Cui (391803)
Yuelong Shu (132243)
Peipei Xu (391804)
Cuiling Xu (223774)
Tao Chen (75911)

March 2013

The black line is the time series of raw data, while the red line is the sinusoidal fitting curve...

The comparison between raw data and sinusoidal model fit results for the south1 district.

Jingyang Zou (391802)
Hua Yang (120668)
Hengjian Cui (391803)
Yuelong Shu (132243)
Peipei Xu (391804)
Cuiling Xu (223774)
Tao Chen (75911)

March 2013

The black line is the time series of raw data, while the red line is the sinusoidal fitting curve...

Comparison of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for prediction of mortality among different scoring systems in training cohort (panel A, at 12-month; panel B, at 36-month), and in validation cohort (panel C, at 12-month; panel D, at 36-month).

Sha Huang (459101)
Gui-Qian Huang (752018)
Gui-Qi Zhu (752019)
Wen-Yue Liu (138454)
Jie You (42305)
Ke-Qing Shi (138450)
Xiao-Bo Wang (3228759)
Han-Yang Che (752020)
Guo-Liang Chen (652632)
Jian-Feng Fang (752021)
Yi Zhou (2723)
Meng-Tao Zhou (5663959)
Yong-Ping Chen (138457)
Martin Braddock (752022)
Ming-Hua Zheng (138448)

June 2015

P values: (1) Panel A: a vs b = 0.0004; a vs c = 0.0004; a vs d < 0.0001; a vs e < 0.0001; (2) Pa...

Comparisons of mean ADI and SVI scores among tracts with good and poor index agreement.

Kimberly A. Rollings (6735737)
Grace A. Noppert (5697851)
Jennifer J. Griggs (11613941)
Robert A. Melendez (17102650)
Philippa J. Clarke (10663551)

October 2023

Abbreviations: ADI, area deprivation index; SVI, social vulnerability index. a = The image illustrat...

Comparison of the country ranking between our metrics and the MR.

Matthieu Cristelli (149874)
Andrea Gabrielli (302210)
Andrea Tacchella (302213)
Guido Caldarelli (149870)
Luciano Pietronero (302211)

August 2013

In panel a we compare the two rankings while in panel b and c we respectivel...

Comparison of submitted forecast and final CDC-reported % of clinic visits that were for ILI for the continental USA and three selected regions.

Michal Ben-Nun (413104)
Pete Riley (413103)
James Turtle (6728930)
David P. Bacon (413109)
Steven Riley (31524)

May 2019

Final season CDC reported (black line), reported during the season (black circles) and predicted %IL...

Comparison of different metrics used for modeling the regional interactions.

Luping Zhou (347998)
Yaping Wang (289641)
Yang Li (7082)
Pew-Thian Yap (305644)
Dinggang Shen (204274)

February 2013

The classification accuracy is plotted over different number of training samples. For a given num...

Comparison of GRS predictions.

Benjamin W. Domingue (592124)
Daniel W. Belsky (592125)
Kathleen Mullan Harris (366948)
Andrew Smolen (592126)
Matthew B. McQueen (178154)
Jason D. Boardman (592127)

July 2014

Panel A compares the predictive performance of GRS-E in both white and black samples of Add Healt...

Classification performance comparison.

Stefan P. Koch (709024)
Claudia Hägele (709025)
John-Dylan Haynes (349026)
Andreas Heinz (159095)
Florian Schlagenhauf (303974)
Philipp Sterzer (191281)

March 2015

The top and bottom panels depict percent correct classification rates (accuracies) obtained from ...

Comparison of province-level prediction accuracy between full-data and real-time predictions, by prediction horizon.

Nicholas G. Reich (167708)
Stephen A. Lauer (716220)
Krzysztof Sakrejda (2837681)
Sopon Iamsirithaworn (260152)
Soawapak Hinjoy (332639)
Paphanij Suangtho (2837678)
Suthanun Suthachana (2837675)
Hannah E. Clapham (2157634)
Henrik Salje (589157)
Derek A. T. Cummings (116201)
Justin Lessler (116180)

June 2016

These calculations assume that both the full-data and real-time multi-step predictions began at t...

Comparison over the fitting period.

Abstract

Extracted data

Comparison over the fitting period.

Abstract

Extracted data

Related items

Related items