Generally considered as a monument of erudition and examined almost exclusively from a philological point of view, Julius von Schlosser’s “Kunstliteratur” (Vienna, 1924) is seldom analyzed, on the contrary, from a theoretical, conceptual or philosophical perspective. This paper provides a critical reading of Schlosser’s restrictive concept of “written sources” putting it in relation with a larger network of intellectual exchanges, in which Croce’s aesthetic premises and Vossler’s linguistic investigations play an important role in the process of epistemological distinction between “Kulturgeschichte” (History of Culture) and “Kunstgeschichte” (History of Art)
In the same year of 1934 as Julius von Schlosser celebrated the eightieth anniversary of the Österre...
Since so much emotion has accrued around the figure of Hans Sedlmayr due to his collaboration during...
This article examines the special features of the atmosphere in Habsburg’s Vienna, which led to the ...
This is the first book by Julius Schlosser to appear in English. Written in 1907, it offers an excel...
Although Julius Schlosser is well known by name and as a source for bibliographical references, very...
The essay analyzes the philosophical and methodological premises of Julius von Schlosser’s most impo...
In the present essay of 1936, Julius Schlosser seems to have originated the term of ‘die Wiener Schu...
FONTES presents sources and documents for the early modern history of art, together with commentarie...
Julius v. Schlosser, The Vienna School of the History of Art - Review of a Century of Austrian Sch...
A translation of Julius Schlosser’s assessment of Hans Sedlmayr’s application for Habilitation
While Riegl, Dvořák, Sedlmayr and Pächt have each of them aroused widespread enthusiasm at one point...
Julius von Schlosser (1866-1938), Commemorative volume of the Wiener Jahrbuch für Kunstgeschichte (v...
For two centuries, Gesamtkunstwerk—the ideal of the “total work of art”—has exerted a powerful influ...
Heyder JC. Same, similar, semblable – Languages of Connoisseurship. Journal of Art Historiography. 2...
This article constitutes a detailed critical reading of Edgar Wind’s early work, focussing, in parti...
In the same year of 1934 as Julius von Schlosser celebrated the eightieth anniversary of the Österre...
Since so much emotion has accrued around the figure of Hans Sedlmayr due to his collaboration during...
This article examines the special features of the atmosphere in Habsburg’s Vienna, which led to the ...
This is the first book by Julius Schlosser to appear in English. Written in 1907, it offers an excel...
Although Julius Schlosser is well known by name and as a source for bibliographical references, very...
The essay analyzes the philosophical and methodological premises of Julius von Schlosser’s most impo...
In the present essay of 1936, Julius Schlosser seems to have originated the term of ‘die Wiener Schu...
FONTES presents sources and documents for the early modern history of art, together with commentarie...
Julius v. Schlosser, The Vienna School of the History of Art - Review of a Century of Austrian Sch...
A translation of Julius Schlosser’s assessment of Hans Sedlmayr’s application for Habilitation
While Riegl, Dvořák, Sedlmayr and Pächt have each of them aroused widespread enthusiasm at one point...
Julius von Schlosser (1866-1938), Commemorative volume of the Wiener Jahrbuch für Kunstgeschichte (v...
For two centuries, Gesamtkunstwerk—the ideal of the “total work of art”—has exerted a powerful influ...
Heyder JC. Same, similar, semblable – Languages of Connoisseurship. Journal of Art Historiography. 2...
This article constitutes a detailed critical reading of Edgar Wind’s early work, focussing, in parti...
In the same year of 1934 as Julius von Schlosser celebrated the eightieth anniversary of the Österre...
Since so much emotion has accrued around the figure of Hans Sedlmayr due to his collaboration during...
This article examines the special features of the atmosphere in Habsburg’s Vienna, which led to the ...