Scenario descriptions and parameter combinations are adapted directly from Ioannidis [1]. The remaining columns contain the results from simulations of 5,000 published findings using different effect size distributions in our model. The parameters for the distributions are set so that the prevalence of effects above the minimum effect of interest approximate the odds specified by the scenario. Missing values in some scenarios occur when the desired prevalence cannot be achieved without changing the minimum effect of interest, thus complicating direct comparisons with other scenarios. * For Two Normals, one cannot obtain the desired prevalence (66,7%) without changing the minimum of interest threshold or the SD of the wider normal. A normal ...
Both fixed and random effects models have been used to simulate the meta-analyses. The fixed effects...
<p>The true positive rate (TPR, row 1), false discovery rate (FDR, row 2) and false positive rate (F...
These are the same results shown in Fig 2A(capped at an odds ratio of 1), and are meant to be more d...
Scenario descriptions and parameter combinations are adapted directly from Ioannidis [1]. The remain...
Scenario descriptions, parameter combinations and the Analytical column are adapted directly from Io...
These results are similar to those presented in Fig 2, except that the decision to publish takes the...
Each point corresponds to a simulation with 5,000 published findings. True effects are defined as th...
Columns show parameters used for each version of the model. The weight of the second normal WB is va...
In the Dichotomous model (A), the density curve is replaced by a histogram, as effects sizes are str...
Each point corresponds to a simulation with 1,000 published findings. In each panel, graphs correspo...
<p>The true positive rate (TPR, row 1), false discovery rate (FDR, row 2) and false positive rate (F...
<p>The first to third columns denote the effect sizes of SNP1, SNP2 and interaction in pure samples ...
In (A), sample size is calculated to detect the mean of the true effect sizes above the minimum of i...
<p>Simulations were run on realisations with the median (A), minimum (B) and maximum (C) overall pre...
Table A. Parameter values used for the simulations. Fig A. Distribution of prevalences across the 14...
Both fixed and random effects models have been used to simulate the meta-analyses. The fixed effects...
<p>The true positive rate (TPR, row 1), false discovery rate (FDR, row 2) and false positive rate (F...
These are the same results shown in Fig 2A(capped at an odds ratio of 1), and are meant to be more d...
Scenario descriptions and parameter combinations are adapted directly from Ioannidis [1]. The remain...
Scenario descriptions, parameter combinations and the Analytical column are adapted directly from Io...
These results are similar to those presented in Fig 2, except that the decision to publish takes the...
Each point corresponds to a simulation with 5,000 published findings. True effects are defined as th...
Columns show parameters used for each version of the model. The weight of the second normal WB is va...
In the Dichotomous model (A), the density curve is replaced by a histogram, as effects sizes are str...
Each point corresponds to a simulation with 1,000 published findings. In each panel, graphs correspo...
<p>The true positive rate (TPR, row 1), false discovery rate (FDR, row 2) and false positive rate (F...
<p>The first to third columns denote the effect sizes of SNP1, SNP2 and interaction in pure samples ...
In (A), sample size is calculated to detect the mean of the true effect sizes above the minimum of i...
<p>Simulations were run on realisations with the median (A), minimum (B) and maximum (C) overall pre...
Table A. Parameter values used for the simulations. Fig A. Distribution of prevalences across the 14...
Both fixed and random effects models have been used to simulate the meta-analyses. The fixed effects...
<p>The true positive rate (TPR, row 1), false discovery rate (FDR, row 2) and false positive rate (F...
These are the same results shown in Fig 2A(capped at an odds ratio of 1), and are meant to be more d...