In Locke v. Davey, the United States Supreme Court held that a state-sponsored scholarship program that excluded students who were majoring in devotional theology did not violate the Free Exercise Clause of the United States Constitution. The Court\u27s holding left a great deal of uncertainty on when states may withhold benefits on the basis of religion
The United States Supreme Court has struggled with the countervailing directives of the Free Exercis...
In Employment Division v. Smith, the Supreme Court famously held that the First Amendment Free Exerc...
The Supreme Court has recently expressed a renewed interest in the question of when the Free Exercis...
In Davey v. Locke, a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that Wa...
Part II of this Note presents the factual background and procedural history of Davey v. Locke. Part ...
Professor Oh briefly describes Locke v. Davey in which the U.S. Supreme Court, in its 2003-04 term, ...
The Supreme Court of the United States held that a state constitutional provision prohibiting the us...
In Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. Comer, the Supreme Court determined that a state could not...
When a claimant challenges some governmental law or action under the Free Exercise Clause of the Fir...
In the 1990 case of Employment Division v. Smith, a sharply divided Supreme Court abandoned the rout...
Does excluding religious schools from a state-sponsored scholarship program amount to unconstitution...
In Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer, the U.S. Supreme Court established a new constitutional rule. W...
This Article uses the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in Christian Legal Societyv. Martinez as a poin...
The Supreme Court case of Employment Division v. Smith revived an older view of the Constitution\u27...
Much has been written about the protections afforded by the Free Exercise Clause when government reg...
The United States Supreme Court has struggled with the countervailing directives of the Free Exercis...
In Employment Division v. Smith, the Supreme Court famously held that the First Amendment Free Exerc...
The Supreme Court has recently expressed a renewed interest in the question of when the Free Exercis...
In Davey v. Locke, a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that Wa...
Part II of this Note presents the factual background and procedural history of Davey v. Locke. Part ...
Professor Oh briefly describes Locke v. Davey in which the U.S. Supreme Court, in its 2003-04 term, ...
The Supreme Court of the United States held that a state constitutional provision prohibiting the us...
In Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. Comer, the Supreme Court determined that a state could not...
When a claimant challenges some governmental law or action under the Free Exercise Clause of the Fir...
In the 1990 case of Employment Division v. Smith, a sharply divided Supreme Court abandoned the rout...
Does excluding religious schools from a state-sponsored scholarship program amount to unconstitution...
In Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer, the U.S. Supreme Court established a new constitutional rule. W...
This Article uses the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in Christian Legal Societyv. Martinez as a poin...
The Supreme Court case of Employment Division v. Smith revived an older view of the Constitution\u27...
Much has been written about the protections afforded by the Free Exercise Clause when government reg...
The United States Supreme Court has struggled with the countervailing directives of the Free Exercis...
In Employment Division v. Smith, the Supreme Court famously held that the First Amendment Free Exerc...
The Supreme Court has recently expressed a renewed interest in the question of when the Free Exercis...
Add to ORKG