Add to ORKGThe Supreme Court of the United States held that a state constitutional provision prohibiting the use of public funds by an individual for religious purposes did not violate the Free Exercise Clause. Locke v. Davey, 124 S. Ct. 1307 (2004)
This Article analyzed Chief Justice Rehnquist\u27s Footnote Three dictum, and concluded that the Pro...
In a letter to the Danbury Baptist Association, Thomas Jefferson stated the need for a wall of sepa...
Scholarship programs authored by state legislatures may conflict with a state\u27s constitution. In...
Professor Oh briefly describes Locke v. Davey in which the U.S. Supreme Court, in its 2003-04 term, ...
In Davey v. Locke, a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that Wa...
Does excluding religious schools from a state-sponsored scholarship program amount to unconstitution...
Does excluding religious schools from a state-sponsored scholarship program amount to unconstitution...
Plaintiffs, four individual Maryland citizens and taxpayers, brought this action challenging the con...
In Locke v. Davey, the United States Supreme Court held that a state-sponsored scholarship program t...
Because defendant school district did not maintain a high school within the school district, tuition...
The United States Supreme Court has struggled with the countervailing directives of the Free Exercis...
Part II of this Note presents the factual background and procedural history of Davey v. Locke. Part ...
The United States Supreme Court has held that parochial schools\u27 good-faith, reasonable reliance ...
The issue of public funding of religious institutions in education is bound up with the establishmen...
The United States Supreme Court held that a state law creating a public school district for a villag...
This Article analyzed Chief Justice Rehnquist\u27s Footnote Three dictum, and concluded that the Pro...
In a letter to the Danbury Baptist Association, Thomas Jefferson stated the need for a wall of sepa...
Scholarship programs authored by state legislatures may conflict with a state\u27s constitution. In...
Professor Oh briefly describes Locke v. Davey in which the U.S. Supreme Court, in its 2003-04 term, ...
In Davey v. Locke, a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that Wa...
Does excluding religious schools from a state-sponsored scholarship program amount to unconstitution...
Does excluding religious schools from a state-sponsored scholarship program amount to unconstitution...
Plaintiffs, four individual Maryland citizens and taxpayers, brought this action challenging the con...
In Locke v. Davey, the United States Supreme Court held that a state-sponsored scholarship program t...
Because defendant school district did not maintain a high school within the school district, tuition...
The United States Supreme Court has struggled with the countervailing directives of the Free Exercis...
Part II of this Note presents the factual background and procedural history of Davey v. Locke. Part ...
The United States Supreme Court has held that parochial schools\u27 good-faith, reasonable reliance ...
The issue of public funding of religious institutions in education is bound up with the establishmen...
The United States Supreme Court held that a state law creating a public school district for a villag...
This Article analyzed Chief Justice Rehnquist\u27s Footnote Three dictum, and concluded that the Pro...
In a letter to the Danbury Baptist Association, Thomas Jefferson stated the need for a wall of sepa...
Scholarship programs authored by state legislatures may conflict with a state\u27s constitution. In...