This article presents and tests psychological distance to science (PSYDISC) as a domain-general predictor of science skepticism. Drawing on the concept of psychological distance, PSYDISC reflects the extent to which individuals perceive science as a tangible undertaking conducted by people similar to oneself (social), with effects in the here (spatial) and now (temporal), and as useful and applicable in the real world (hypothetical distance). In six studies (two preregistered; total N = 1,630) and two countries, we developed and established the factor structure and validity of a scale measuring PSYDISC. Crucially, higher PSYDISC predicted skepticism beyond established predictors, across science domains. A final study showed that PSYDISC sha...
The construct of psychological distance has gained traction as an explanation of why climate change ...
The quantity of processing view of motivated reasoning predicts that individuals are more likely to ...
Pseudo-profound bullshit receptivity is the tendency to perceive meaning in important-sounding, nons...
In the current paper, we argue that to get a better understanding of the psychological antecedents o...
Many topics that scientists investigate speak to people’s ideological worldviews. We report three st...
The global spread of antiscience beliefs, misinformation, fake news, and conspiracy theories is pos...
Since the 1970s, there has been a growing interest in how individuals appropriate scientific knowled...
Data indicate that large percentages of the general public regard psychology’s scientific status wit...
Recent work points to the heterogeneous nature of science skepticism. However, most research on scie...
Even a cursory review of social science literature reveals a wealth of research into the role that s...
The Belief in Science Scale (BISS) is a unidimensional measure that assesses the degree to which sci...
Scientific knowledge has been accepted as the main driver of development, allowing for longer, healt...
Science is recognised and accepted as an important tool for understanding the world in which we live...
At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, psychological scientists frequently made on-the-record predic...
The construct of psychological distance has gained traction as an explanation of why climate change ...
The quantity of processing view of motivated reasoning predicts that individuals are more likely to ...
Pseudo-profound bullshit receptivity is the tendency to perceive meaning in important-sounding, nons...
In the current paper, we argue that to get a better understanding of the psychological antecedents o...
Many topics that scientists investigate speak to people’s ideological worldviews. We report three st...
The global spread of antiscience beliefs, misinformation, fake news, and conspiracy theories is pos...
Since the 1970s, there has been a growing interest in how individuals appropriate scientific knowled...
Data indicate that large percentages of the general public regard psychology’s scientific status wit...
Recent work points to the heterogeneous nature of science skepticism. However, most research on scie...
Even a cursory review of social science literature reveals a wealth of research into the role that s...
The Belief in Science Scale (BISS) is a unidimensional measure that assesses the degree to which sci...
Scientific knowledge has been accepted as the main driver of development, allowing for longer, healt...
Science is recognised and accepted as an important tool for understanding the world in which we live...
At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, psychological scientists frequently made on-the-record predic...
The construct of psychological distance has gained traction as an explanation of why climate change ...
The quantity of processing view of motivated reasoning predicts that individuals are more likely to ...
Pseudo-profound bullshit receptivity is the tendency to perceive meaning in important-sounding, nons...