The Michigan Use Tax Act requires every seller of tangible personal property for storage, use or other consumption in the state of Michigan, engaged in the business of selling at retail in Michigan, to collect the tax imposed by the act. Plaintiff is an Illinois corporation operating a merchant tailoring establishment in Chicago. It takes orders in Michigan, from residents, for clothes, fills the orders in Chicago and, by agreement, the title to the clothes is vested in the purchaser upon delivery in Chicago to an interstate carrier. It maintains a branch office in Detroit where samples are kept, salesmen take measurements and orders and accept down payments. Collections of unpaid balances are also made at the Detroit office and are deposit...
Plaintiff brought suit to enjoin the collection of a state tax on intangibles consisting of stocks h...
Taxpayer sued to enjoin collection of federal insurance contributions and unemployment taxes with re...
In the recent case City of Detroit v. Proctor, the defendant, a resident of Detroit, was owner of pe...
The Michigan Use Tax Act requires every seller of tangible personal property for storage, use or oth...
Plaintiff, a Tennessee corporation, sued to recover taxes paid under protest pursuant to the Mississ...
The respondent, a New York corporation licensed to do retail business in Iowa, did a large mail orde...
A statute provided that it was unlawful to operate an automobile over the state highway without payi...
Appellants were partners in the securities business with offices in New York City. In the course of ...
Appellant, a Missouri corporation, was domiciled in Illinois and engaged in interstate trucking of c...
Plaintiff, a Massachusetts manufacturing corporation operating on a mail order-f.o.b. delivery basis...
Appellant, an Iowa corporation, maintained a sales office in Minnesota and employed salesmen who sol...
Appellant is a Delaware corporation engaging in the retail furniture business in Delaware. It has no...
The 1949 revision of the Michigan Sales Tax Act changed the federal exemption provision so as to per...
An Ohio statute required foreign corporations doing business within the state to pay an ad valorem t...
The taxpayer purchased A Company stock from X for $100,000 and later sold it for $7,500, deducting t...
Plaintiff brought suit to enjoin the collection of a state tax on intangibles consisting of stocks h...
Taxpayer sued to enjoin collection of federal insurance contributions and unemployment taxes with re...
In the recent case City of Detroit v. Proctor, the defendant, a resident of Detroit, was owner of pe...
The Michigan Use Tax Act requires every seller of tangible personal property for storage, use or oth...
Plaintiff, a Tennessee corporation, sued to recover taxes paid under protest pursuant to the Mississ...
The respondent, a New York corporation licensed to do retail business in Iowa, did a large mail orde...
A statute provided that it was unlawful to operate an automobile over the state highway without payi...
Appellants were partners in the securities business with offices in New York City. In the course of ...
Appellant, a Missouri corporation, was domiciled in Illinois and engaged in interstate trucking of c...
Plaintiff, a Massachusetts manufacturing corporation operating on a mail order-f.o.b. delivery basis...
Appellant, an Iowa corporation, maintained a sales office in Minnesota and employed salesmen who sol...
Appellant is a Delaware corporation engaging in the retail furniture business in Delaware. It has no...
The 1949 revision of the Michigan Sales Tax Act changed the federal exemption provision so as to per...
An Ohio statute required foreign corporations doing business within the state to pay an ad valorem t...
The taxpayer purchased A Company stock from X for $100,000 and later sold it for $7,500, deducting t...
Plaintiff brought suit to enjoin the collection of a state tax on intangibles consisting of stocks h...
Taxpayer sued to enjoin collection of federal insurance contributions and unemployment taxes with re...
In the recent case City of Detroit v. Proctor, the defendant, a resident of Detroit, was owner of pe...