The taxpayer purchased A Company stock from X for $100,000 and later sold it for $7,500, deducting the loss in his tax return for that year. Following the discovery of fraud on the part of X he reacquired the stock for $8,000 and then negotiated a settlement with X providing for a resale to X for $100,000. To avoid high taxes on the resulting profit, the taxpayer organized B corporation and purchased all its stock. He then sold to it the A Company stock and all his claims against X in return for its promise to pay back the $100,000 in forty annual installments. On the following day the taxpayer, acting as the agent of B corporation, sold the A Company stock and released the tort claim to X for $100,000. The B corporation remained in existen...
Petitioner, E. P. Coady, and M. Christopher each owned 50 percent of the stock of the Christopher Co...
The taxpayer held stock in a corporation - which had been in receivership for five years, and which ...
The recent Supreme Court decision in Le Tulle v. Scofield, disapproving the views of four out of fiv...
As sole stockholder of the Robbins Tire and Rubber Company, the defendant managed and controlled the...
In 1932 the taxpayer sold to the X corporation, which he wholly owned and controlled, certain shares...
The stockholders of a closely held electric utility corporation offered to sell all the corporate st...
Petitioners, from 1937 to 1940, received distributions from the liquidation of a corporation of whic...
Section 104 of the Revenue Act of 1928 imposed a surtax on the net income of any corporation formed...
The taxpayer ordered his broker to sell certain shares of stock purchased in March, 1929, which were...
In 1946 petitioner received a pro-rata dividend of preferred stock of the distributing corporation, ...
A corporation charged off notes as worthless prior to 1942. Anticipating future collections on the n...
In 1948 petitioner and several other taxpayers, who had previously been active in constructing homes...
From 1921 to 1929, appellee corporation bought shares of its own stock, not for retirement, but to s...
Petitioner owned more than three-fourths of the stock in a corporation whose shares had a par value ...
Petitioners had formed a corporation for the purpose of building and operating a housing project. Af...
Petitioner, E. P. Coady, and M. Christopher each owned 50 percent of the stock of the Christopher Co...
The taxpayer held stock in a corporation - which had been in receivership for five years, and which ...
The recent Supreme Court decision in Le Tulle v. Scofield, disapproving the views of four out of fiv...
As sole stockholder of the Robbins Tire and Rubber Company, the defendant managed and controlled the...
In 1932 the taxpayer sold to the X corporation, which he wholly owned and controlled, certain shares...
The stockholders of a closely held electric utility corporation offered to sell all the corporate st...
Petitioners, from 1937 to 1940, received distributions from the liquidation of a corporation of whic...
Section 104 of the Revenue Act of 1928 imposed a surtax on the net income of any corporation formed...
The taxpayer ordered his broker to sell certain shares of stock purchased in March, 1929, which were...
In 1946 petitioner received a pro-rata dividend of preferred stock of the distributing corporation, ...
A corporation charged off notes as worthless prior to 1942. Anticipating future collections on the n...
In 1948 petitioner and several other taxpayers, who had previously been active in constructing homes...
From 1921 to 1929, appellee corporation bought shares of its own stock, not for retirement, but to s...
Petitioner owned more than three-fourths of the stock in a corporation whose shares had a par value ...
Petitioners had formed a corporation for the purpose of building and operating a housing project. Af...
Petitioner, E. P. Coady, and M. Christopher each owned 50 percent of the stock of the Christopher Co...
The taxpayer held stock in a corporation - which had been in receivership for five years, and which ...
The recent Supreme Court decision in Le Tulle v. Scofield, disapproving the views of four out of fiv...