There is a strong commitment that constitutional adjudication should be more predictable. As a principle, what has been rightly decided in the past should be the law for the future cases or controvercies. This article makes a substantial critics directed to the constitutional court of decision Number 14/PUU-XI/2013 on the constitutionality of presidential election rules. This articles argues that the decision shows that predictability is still a serious matter in constitutional adjudication in Indonesia. The author then recommends that to be more predictable the constitutional of court should make a judicial tradition for respecting its past right decisions
Introduction: The Constitutional Court is a state institution that has judicial authority based on t...
The Constitutional Court plays a central role in the democratic systemgovernance. With a solid persp...
This research is motivated by the number of unimplemented Constitutional Court decisions, although t...
There is a strong commitment that constitutional adjudication should be more predictable. As a princ...
Artikel ini membahas kemungkinan untuk Mahkamah Agung menjalankan fungsi sebagai peradilan konstitus...
Integrity, good character, justice, and expert statesman of the constitution as the indicator...
This article examines Constitutional Court Decision Number 14/PUU-XI/2013 following the simultaneous...
This article examines the constitutional status of Constitutional Court's decisions constitutionally...
The Constitutional Court's presence yields positive impacts on constitutional law, yet isn't devoid ...
Implications of Constitutional Court Decision No. 14 / PUU-XI / 2013 on General Election In Unison. ...
. Integrity, good character, justice, and expert statesman of the constitution as the indicators to ...
The Constitutional Court\u27s presence yields positive impacts on constitutional law, yet isn\u27t d...
A transformative amendment of the 1945 Constitution established a separate judicial institution call...
In principle, in deciding the case of judicial review, the Constitutional Court can only act as a ne...
A transformative amendment of the 1945 Constitution established a separate judicial institution call...
Introduction: The Constitutional Court is a state institution that has judicial authority based on t...
The Constitutional Court plays a central role in the democratic systemgovernance. With a solid persp...
This research is motivated by the number of unimplemented Constitutional Court decisions, although t...
There is a strong commitment that constitutional adjudication should be more predictable. As a princ...
Artikel ini membahas kemungkinan untuk Mahkamah Agung menjalankan fungsi sebagai peradilan konstitus...
Integrity, good character, justice, and expert statesman of the constitution as the indicator...
This article examines Constitutional Court Decision Number 14/PUU-XI/2013 following the simultaneous...
This article examines the constitutional status of Constitutional Court's decisions constitutionally...
The Constitutional Court's presence yields positive impacts on constitutional law, yet isn't devoid ...
Implications of Constitutional Court Decision No. 14 / PUU-XI / 2013 on General Election In Unison. ...
. Integrity, good character, justice, and expert statesman of the constitution as the indicators to ...
The Constitutional Court\u27s presence yields positive impacts on constitutional law, yet isn\u27t d...
A transformative amendment of the 1945 Constitution established a separate judicial institution call...
In principle, in deciding the case of judicial review, the Constitutional Court can only act as a ne...
A transformative amendment of the 1945 Constitution established a separate judicial institution call...
Introduction: The Constitutional Court is a state institution that has judicial authority based on t...
The Constitutional Court plays a central role in the democratic systemgovernance. With a solid persp...
This research is motivated by the number of unimplemented Constitutional Court decisions, although t...