Convergence of Constitutional Interpretation to the Test of Laws Through a Constitutional Dialogue Approach: Konvergensi Penafsiran Konstitusional Terhadap Pengujian Undang-Undang Melalui Pendekatan Constitutional Dialogue

The Constitutional Court\u27s presence yields positive impacts on constitutional law, yet isn\u27t devoid of controversies, including Judge misconduct, transgression of \u27nemo judex idoneus in propria causa\u27 principle, and potential super body transformation. This paper aims to comprehend and analyze constitutional interpretation dominance in assessing laws against the 1945 Constitution through a constitutional dialogue approach. This normative writing employs legal, historical, and conceptual methods. Findings underscore: 1) Demonstrating respect for state institutions, notably the People\u27s Consultative Assembly of Indonesia. 2) Establishing a more democratic system to test the 1945 Constitution\u27s compatibility in the Constitutional Court. 3) Breaking the monopoly of Constitutional Court-centric constitutional interpretation. 4) Reviving \u27nemo judex idoneus in propria causa\u27 principle is pivotal due to extensive testing of Constitutional Court Law, addressing concerns about verdict impartiality